Main Page
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Welcome to New Qualitipedia Wiki!
Welcome to the New Qualitipedia Wiki, a reboot of Qualitipedia.
Featured Articles
Bad Media
Read about a movie that's "so bad it's good."
Read about the greediest gaming company in the world
Good Media
Read about a great example of a good Mario fan game.
Rules
- No harassment
- No bullying
- No vandalism
- No spamming
- No opinion bashing
- Always obey the admins
- If you want to import certain pages from other wikis here, you should either ask to the admins or Original Authority to import them with all edits and revisions, due to Original Authority stating under CC BY-NC-SA licensing, "you must attribute the source of the wiki that your edits are copied from."
- To assist with this, local user permissions have been modified on this wiki specifically to allow autoconfirmed users to import pages from other wikis.
- For larger imports, please prepare the files yourself (using Special:Export) and then upload them at Special:RequestImportDump. Please then create a task on YouTrack to alert a staff member about the request and it will be imported. Staff will not prepare the files for users — they must prepare and upload the file themselves.
- Do not create separate reception wikis, as they (at least currently) clog up the hosting service, since there are so far like 22 wikis and Original Authority doesn't accept separate reception wikis.
- When creating a page that is either well-received or poorly-received, always put one of these categories: Bad media or good media. This was done to avoid confusion.
- You must be at least 13 years old in order to contribute in the wiki. If you're younger than said age, you will be banned, due to the wiki being hosted in a hosting service created in the UK, which severely follows the GDPR.
- Inappropriate language is forbidden. During the first two times, you will get a warning, but in the third time, the Abuse Filter will block you.
- Do not create a category without the consent of the admins. If you want to create one category, ask one of us.
- While criticizing political stuff is generally allowed, there are some exceptions:
- The words "SJW" and "Anti-SJW" are severely prohibited due to them being some of the main factors why the Original Qualitipedia shut down. Use the term "politics" instead of "SJWs"
- Do not criticize political stuff from a biased perspective, such as calling something left-wing because you're right-wing, because the wiki tries to maintain a neutral perspective on political stuff.
- It should be only criticized when it does affect the quality of a certain show or goes against the show's nature of being neutral (for example, it makes sense for Funimation to be criticized for adding their anti-GamerGate agenda in their Prison School dub because not only the movement is American, while the anime is Japanese (making it out of place),as well the fact that not everyone has same political opinions, but it's also because the anime was never about stuff like this).
- Copy pasting pages from the original Reception Wikis is now forbidden, because this defeats the purpose of making a reboot in the first place. Rebooting should fix issues, not bring back them by copy pasting pages. Pages that were copy pasted before this rule was implemented (March 16th, 2023) are allowed to be here.
- As of July 30th, 2023, adding new stuff to copy-pasted pages before adding them will still result in a deletion.
- If you want to be an admin, you should follow these rules:
- Don't spam constantly the admins to become one yourself, because you will not get a response (at best) and get blocked temporarily (at worst).
- Good behaviour is one of the main things an user should have.
- Prove yourself you're worthy of becoming an admin.
- Users who became moderators or admins in other wikis will be allowed to be one if they're interested, but if they did controversial stuff for their opinions then they're blacklisted (like Szczypak2005).
- Copy pasting info from Wikipedia pages is strictly prohibited due to it being labeled as "content fork", which violates Telepedia's Content Policy.
- If you break any of these rules:
- 1st Time: Warning
- 2nd Time: 1-week block
- 3rd Time: 1-month block
- 4th Time: 3-month block
- 5th Time: 6-month block
- 6th Time: 1-year block
- 7th Time: Indefinite block
- Pages of bad media that promote awful and illegal things like pedophilia, rape, terrorism and suicide are prohibited from having redeeming qualities, since these topics are irredeemable. As for suicide, it can be only tolerated on having redeeming qualities if said media wanted to tell a story that has suicide but unintentionally promoted it (like 13 Reasons Why).
- For a page to be featured, it must have:
- At least 5 pointers (all of which need to be detailed)
- High quality images.
- No MediaWiki issues.
- No grammar errors.
- Videos must be displayed correctly.
- They must be reviewed by the admins. Never add them by yourself.
- Also, pages must always be detailed or be popular and more recognized or have an intersting topic (either shocking like Sin Kids AU or acclaimed like The Owl House, The Simpsons and Super Mario.)
Forbidden Pages
In General
- Pages about real people, including celebrities and YouTubers: They caused drama in the old Qualitipedia, so we should avoid making these pages.
- Pages about good or bad characters: Pointless pages, since Incredible Characters Wiki and Loathsome Characters Wiki still exist on Miraheze.
- Pages about stuff outside of videogames, shows, movies and books: Against Content Policy. Websites are allowed, as long they follow the type of content this wiki focuses, such as YouTube and DKOldies. If it's stuff like Twitter then it's forbidden.
- Pokémon Sword and Shield: Has a long history of drama on Crappy Games Wiki but it's also not good enough to be written from a positive persepective.
- The Loud House Movie: Too divisive for its own topic and also has a long history of drama on Awful Movies Wiki and Greatest Movies Wiki.
- Game Freak: Too divisive for its own topic.
- Kamp Koral: SpongeBob's Under Years: Too divisive for its own topic.
- Uncle Grandpa: Too divisise for its own topic.
- Gacha Life Movies/Mini Movies and Series (unless they're incredibly very high quality like The Music Freaks): Are not officially considered movies and webseries, and they can clog up the wiki.
Negative Perspective/Media
- Requiem for a Loud (fanfiction of The Loud House): The reception of this fanfic was very positive.
- Magical Girl Site (manga): Fine reception on MyAnimeList and Goodreads.
- Magical Girl Site (anime): Even though, it has a 5.9/10 on IMDb, it received mixed-to-positive reviews, especially considering the episodes range from 6.8 to 7.5, as pointed out by King Dice, a former admin of old Qualitipedia.
- Halo Infinite (campaign): While the game is being criticized for its multiplayer counterpart, the campaign is well-received. A page criticizing the multiplayer is allowed though.
- Minecraft: Story Mode: Even though it received mixed reviews on Metacritic, it later gained cult following and was also considered underrated.
- All the Five Nights at Freddy's games (except FNaF World): They're widely considered games that revolutionized indie horror games and even though some games like FNaF 3 and 4 had mixed reviews on Metacritic, they're still considered great games thanks to them expanding the lore of the franchise.
- The 2003-2005 era of Bom Dia & Cia: Despite the terrible hosts of that era: Jéssica Esteves and Kauê Santin, it did air amazing cartoons.
Positive Perspective/Media
- Poppy's Playtime: Has a negative reception, EnchantedMob (the owners of MOB Games) harassed a small animator, and the game plagiarized said animator's game. The game also used to make use of NFTs.
- 13 Reasons Why (season 1): Even though it has a positive reception on Rotten Tomatoes, it was THE season that gained controversies for glorifying suicide.
- The Patrick Star Show: Even though it was allowed on Best Shows & Episodes Wiki due to a poll, it garnered negative reviews, especially on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes.
- Big Mouth: Even though it has positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb, it became more divisive as the show progressed and also became Netflix's biggest cash cow.
- NBA 2K24: Has received very poorly, critics shouldn't be trusted because they're notorious for being bribed by companies.
Admins
Need something? Ask the admins here.