Qualitipedia:Staff noticeboard
Staff noticeboard
This page exists to bring issues to staff attention. If you have an issue on a particular page, start the discussion on that talk page - only use this noticeboard to bring staff attention to it. When possible, ie, if there is an edit war, try to resolve the problem with the other user before getting staff involved. This board is monitored by all staff. Staff members should only respond if they have a clear answer or request for further information, the same for any other user who comments - off topic commentary may be removed strictly. If you cannot resolve the issue, please avoid stepping in. It's okay to make a general discussion topic elsewhere for a broader issue. To get started, make a header in the right section ( See also:
Archives: None at this time. |
Features and bugs
Request a change or report an issue in how Qualtipedia runs technically. Check if a topic already exists! If it is serious enough it will be forwarded to Telepedia Staff.
Old Comments Section
Hello. I'm helping out by removing the old comments section onto pages (mainly ones that don't have comments yet before the extension was added), but since there's about 1000+ pages that still has these, it might take a long time to edit them all out manually. Especially since I'm the only one doing the removal so far. Is there a mass edit feature on this site that can be used to remove all the old comments section, so that it doesn't conflict with the new CommentStreams extension? Snow (talk) 00:44, December 2, 2023 (UTC)
- My intention with this was to leave old comments up for a few weeks to give people a chance to save or repost them to the new system. When this time is up, they will be mass removed using an extension. The fact this would take a heck of a long time to do manually is why I only asked that no new tags be added as removing the old ones is not something realistic to do manually on the spot. I do appreciate the proactivity on this. I would suggest keeping to other maintenance edits for now and if an old comment section is unused on a page you come across, feel free to take it out along the way. --Raidarr (talk) 00:55, December 2, 2023 (UTC)
Reports and disputes
Report a problem for staff to look into or appeal a staff decision.
Request permissions
Request permissions such as confirmed if you need it. You can also request a staff position, but be prepared to offer reasons for your request and answer questions if you do.
Other requests
Create a new header for any other matter that should have a staff response.
Swearing and mature articles
We all know that swearing is forbidden but can we just make one little change to the rules that uncensored swearing is only allowed in articles with mature warning only???? Because if you ain't targeting for people under 18 then why bother censoring swear words?????38.25.151.57 13:57, December 5, 2023 (UTC)
- For one it is frowned upon from an advertising and Telepedia platform perspective, and beyond that it's simply not necessary. Frankly even the articles flagged mature are probably written and read by underage users in the first place. So I don't see the need to change this. --Raidarr (talk) 14:47, December 5, 2023 (UTC)
Censorship
Because in this wiki swearing is forbidden unless censored mean that you guys support censorship and oppose free speech?FrankInHD2010 (talk) 19:04, December 13, 2023 (UTC)
- Those two are not synonymous with one another. Preventing swearing is not the same as censorship. -- Original Authority (talk) 19:31, December 13, 2023 (UTC)
- Free speech is not a right here. First of all it doesn't mean what you think it means even in the United States never mind the fact this wiki is hosted in the UK. Secondly, your edits have proven to be disruptive and I'm going to ask you to stop. The rules are in place on this matter for a reason and if you are going to bypass them and then protest with irrelevant arguments then you are probably not going to get along here. --Raidarr (talk) 19:35, December 13, 2023 (UTC)
A Vandal in Our Midst
Hello, staff, I am here to talk about a serious problem. There is this user called BombIran who keeps vandalizing pages and replacing them with unrelated topics from Trey Parker and Matt Stone's Team America. Can someone please block them from this wiki so they don't mess any more pages up? Thanks for your time and consideration! CarltheToonMan42 (talk) 20:35, January 3, 2024 (UTC)
- It's now done, Pacman64fanj (talk) 20:54, January 3, 2024 (UTC)
Someone Deal With This Guy...
Here we go again... This user known as DisneyFan12414 keeps saying that this wiki should be deleted, when I say it should stay, and even vandalized a few bits on the main page discussion! I need some admin to deal with that guy, and fast!
CarltheToonMan42 (talk) 18:58, January 12, 2024 (UTC)
- He's gone, probably not to be unblocked in the future. --Raidarr (talk) 21:59, January 12, 2024 (UTC)
Can any admins/mods delete these pages?
Found in the Candidates for deletion, a majority of these are unrelated subpages caused by users who may not understand how to properly move from their sandboxes to mainspace pages. Snow (talk) 11:08, March 18, 2024 (UTC)
addition to forbidden content
it would make sense for music to be in forbidden content as the EMW and HMW exist on miraheze. also for anybody who knows why did the qualitipedia music reception wikis close (besides QP shutting down)? - ToTheEdge (talk)
Edit war
A user named Angry109 keeps edit warring on the Modern Cartoon Network page over the infobox quote, he wants it as the new slogan for CN, but the other quote is funny to me, can staff talk to them?TheMoonandEarth (talk) 21:33, March 19, 2024 (UTC)
Yet Another Vandal
Here we go with another vandal! This one is called "W," and they keep making their own edits and arguing with TheMoonandEarth over petty differences. They always want Moon to say what their gender is, and two templates keep getting ruined because of it. Somebody, please do something! CarltheToonMan42 (talk) 16:05, March 23, 2024 (UTC)
Mad Max: Fury Road
I was thinking of having that article as "Featured" in the "Good Media" section of the main page, if any of you are able to look at it's page and think that its good enough to be featured, but I was worried about making this request because I was afraid that it may not be enough for it to be featured in the first place, so I was wondering if the said page I'm talking about is decent/good enough for it to be a "featured article" in the "Good media" section; do you think the page is enough for that? - TheSun42 (talk) 02:28, April 8, 2024 (UTC)
SpongeBob SquarePants (seasons 6-8)
i was thinking that this show's bad era is notable enough to be featured on the front page because of just how bad these seasons are - ToTheEdge (talk) 14:18, April 17, 2024 (UTC)
Oppenheimer
After quite a lot of edits of this movie's page, I was thinking that it should become a featured article. So, I was wondering if any of you are able to look at said page and decide whether or not it’s actually good enough to be a featured article in the "Good Media" section? SlashcraftGaming (talk) 21:10, April 25, 2024 (UTC)