Talk:Elsagate

From Qualitipedia
Latest comment: May 27 by DeliciousBurger in topic Is this page really worthy of Redeeming qualities?
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The original page

This does not appear to be the original page from TSEW. This was the page on TSEW, however, it is worth mentioning that I put that page up for deletion because it did not have the full history from RWW, so do also see the RWW page. CJ should have the TSEW version, if not also the RWW version, in the dump, and both pages (if possible) should be imported with all revisions copied and all edits assigned to users if they exist locally. Money12123 (contribs | sandbox) 21:05, February 15, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is this page really worthy of Redeeming qualities?

For me, giving something that kinda promotes illicit content in a blatant manner which is especially considerable on the age demographic these videos are made for and characters being experimented on (even the disclaimer is not enough to convince that it deserves those qualities).

Even if the individual videos vary from each other, they still have a common theme of reliance of disgusting content and nsfw themes as 'story elements'. Does it glorify these concepts? Depends on creator however they often exploit this material to lure their audiences (children). Elsagate while maybe not directly promoting almost crosses a line at being repulsively depraved and the controversy this media gained tells just how unhealthy this is. Some of the redeeming qualities could be moved to other sections: RQ 1 and 2 could be rewritten to the #Elsagate Phenomenon and RQ 4 and 5 are dubious claims and satire of same content don't really add into the redeeming factors of this media.) DeliciousBurger (talk) 21:32, May 27, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]