Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants: Battle for Bikini Bottom

From Qualitipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Battle for Bikini Bottom Rehydrated is Disappointing

Should we make a separate page for Battle for Bikini Bottom Rehydrated because it has a lot of problems and was a huge let down, even some Battle for Bikini Bottom fans didn’t like the new version and found it disappointing, it pales in comparison to other remakes of classic games like Spyro Reignited and Crash Bandicoot N Sane Trilogy, Nickelodeon rushed the game developers to finish it on time before the third movie came out and it shows, not to mention, the game lied to us that it'll have levels and the Squidward boss that were removed from the original game when that was only for the bad multiplayer feature, there have also been reviewers giving this game negative reception such as this one and he does make good and valid points; https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NLn2XX9daHM

What do you guys think? Jah99 (talk) 17:48, September 4, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

it's not buggy, the platforming is the same, it has nicely updated visuals so i would say hell no ToTheEdge (talk) 18:04, September 4, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The visuals look pretty bad in my eyes, and not to mention, they use the same audio and didn’t improved it, and the loading takes way too long, sorry I might’ve made you upset, but I just don’t like this remake and I don’t think it’s as good as many people make it out to be, no hard feelings, but that’s just my honest opinion Jah99 (talk) 19:53, September 4, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
and it's exactly that, an opinion, prove the reception is mixed or worse and then we can have a separate page, ToTheEdge (talk) 20:27, September 4, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay Jah99 (talk) 21:09, September 4, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
that would be like making a separate page for Majora's Mask 3d because some people think it's a pile of shit ToTheEdge (talk) 18:13, September 4, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
and those people are not the majority ToTheEdge (talk) 18:13, September 4, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]