Reception reviews
I'm among the weirdest users since I am a reception wiki critic almost completely. I don't make pages, I point out errors and I seem to do everything else except content stuff. People who make pages here get a rise of making them, I get a rise of critiquing them. So lets see if we can put that to good use.
Submit a page by comment and I will make a blog entry that honestly reviews the page, in reception wiki style of course. I will look for,
- Point inflation: a redundant point that is there only to get the count up and says nothing new.
- Generalization, poor claims: a point is made against a strawman without a source or background evidence.
- Bald faced lies/plain wrong: bad facts written on the page.
- Critical errors: the reception is nonexistent or doesn't justify the page layout (good/bad)
And little things like poor structure, too long, misses things, etc. If something's done well I'll give it kudos. At the end I'll give it a rating.
No promises on how fast I can deliver. No refunds. I will review the latest revision only, not old versions of pages, and I will review it as I see it - if it's improved later, great. If you give me a draft I will review it as if it's complete. Might be a way to strengthen your drafts before publishing them.
If you have something from another reception wiki I might review that too.
Why don't I just fix the pages? Too many pages not enough time and I don't want to spend 6 months in edit wars training people to think critically. No, if you want me to do that I'll give you my opinion and you can decide if you want to agree with it or not.
If you're interested in this leave a comment and I'll add it to my queue. Best of luck.
Review queue
- User blog:Raidarr/Reception reviews:Burnout Paradise
- User blog:Raidarr/Reception reviews:Sonic Frontiers
- User blog:Raidarr/Reception reviews:Ranma 1/2: Chōnai Gekitōhen
- User blog:Raidarr/Reception reviews:Rayman 2
- User blog:Raidarr/Reception reviews:MVP Baseball 2005