Asset flipping

From Qualitipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Asset flipping is a term that refers to the practice of building a game almost entirely out of pre-made assets with little original work. They are more commonly found on Steam (and even Google Play and the App Store nowadays) being sold for cheap prices. Valve Corporation refers to asset flips as "fake games".

It should be important to point out that there's nothing wrong with using pre-made assets on its own, as long as developers make their own original work with those assets and adjust them to match the game they're developing. This article is about the unethical use of pre-made assets and the exploitation of them.

History

Origin of the name

"Slaughtering Grounds' issues are shared by a number of games released this year. They're not so much 'developed' as they are pieced together, Frankenstein's Monster style, from bits of pre-built assets. There's no artistic or mechanical consistency to the game because it's a hodgepodge of character models, environments, and systems taken from other peoples' work, a bunch of templates that real developers are supposed to build off of, rather than sell on to the customer."

Jim Sterling to The Daily Dot

The term was coined by YouTube personality Jim Sterling during their infamous feud with Digital Homicide. They likened it to the practice of house flipping.

Background

The process of game development has been drastically facilitated with the introduction of free easy-to-use engines that anyone can use like Unity and Game Guru (and sometimes Unreal Engine, but to a lesser extent due to the complexity of the engine). Some of these engines have stores where developers can purchase pre-made assets to use in their games. The core idea behind pre-made assets is to save costs and time in details that developers may not be experienced in; the assets can be studied to learn how they work, be edited to match the art style of the game in question, be used as placeholders until the developer makes their own assets, etc. They can also be a great help for developers who aren't very good with art design and/or can't hire a designer. The engine stores even offer "starter kits", fully functional pre-alpha builds with little content that developers can use as a template to start developing an original game.

Unfortunately, it is also possible to make a game out of nothing but pre-made assets. Doing so is as easy as purchasing the assets and tossing them into the game engine with some basic coding that can also be found on the internet. As a matter of fact, pre-made asset piracy is notoriously easy so there's no guarantee that asset flippers are paying for them.

Pre-made assets usually only have very basic coding and AI because developers are supposed to use them as a helping tool, not make the whole game with them. Games built like this tend to be barely functional, full of glitches, lack content, are short in length, have barely any AI for enemies, lack any art consistency, and overall are just bad games due to having little original work. Because asset flipping takes so little effort and time, it is easy to quickly produce large amounts of shovelware this way. Sometimes asset flipping is as simple as buying a starter kit alpha-build and changing its title without doing any work whatsoever.

This practice is heavily frowned upon because it results in low-quality games, and is considered very lazy since developing a high-quality game takes months to years of hard work. Steam Greenlight and Steam Direct make it far too easy for anyone to put a game for sale on Steam, because of this people can put quickly made asset flips on the store to make a quick buck. Genuine game developers also tend to get angered at asset flips because they can cost just as much as the games those real developers made.

The main method asset flips make a profit is via Steam trading cards. By selling the game for dirt cheap, the users can sell the trading cards and make their money back, then the developer gets a cut of the profit from the cards. People can abuse this loophole by producing tons of asset flips and putting trading cards in all of them. Some even rely on using bot users to farm the cards en masse.

In recent years, the amount of "game developers" and outright scammers that use asset flipping to spam games into Greenlight has increased drastically. One particularly infamous example being Digital Homicide. As a result, Steam has become clogged with massive amounts of shovelware that overshadow real games, and because asset flip games tend to be really low-quality, the practice has also made authentic indie developers look bad.

Valve's fight against asset flips

One of the more controversial aspects of Asset flips is that Valve appears to simply allow Asset Flips to keep spamming Steam with little trouble. It is also known that Valve gets a cut of the profit Asset Flippers generate so it was suspected this is why they didn't do anything to stop it. On April 2017, Jim Sterling and TotalBiscuit had a meeting with Valve about Steam's future. During this meeting, Valve admitted that asset flips are a problem that they want to get rid of and that indeed Trading Card farming is how asset flips make a profit. Valve suggested new policies that in theory will make asset flips completely unprofitable, that way shovelware developers will be less encouraged to continue spamming them.

In late May 2017, Valve announced a new policy in which games aren't allowed to get Trading Cards until their algorithms determine that they aren't Fake Games. Without Trading Cards, Asset flips would in theory completely stop being profitable. This announcement was met with skepticism because their algorithm can potentially fail to work or that Asset Flippers will find and exploit some sort of loophole in the system. Steam Direct has proven to be completely ineffective at slowing down Asset flips. If anything, the system only made it even easier to spam shovelware on Steam as seen with Silicon Echo Studios who posted 173 games on Steam across multiple sockpuppet accounts. The $100 fee proved to be too easy to recover even without trading card milking. Recently, indie devs have been abandoning Steam en masse because the flood of shovelware Asset flips[1] make it impossible for real games to get any visibility[2].

Mobile game industry

The mobile game industry, like Steam, is no stranger to asset flipping. Because Unity has better support for mobile games than any other engine, it has also been a target for several asset flippers. Same as mainstream developers, they also perpetrate similar acts. The only difference however, is that their asset flips are free while mainstream ones are sold for a low price (usually under $10). Their way of making profit is through ad revenue and sometimes microtransactions.

Speaking of ads, with the rise of false mobile game ads towards the end of the 2010s and several mobile game devs shifting their focus onto falsely advertising their games and spending more time on marketing, this practice was transferred to the ads, where assets are used in machinima renders made with the game engine and said renders being passed off as game ads. This has been frowned upon by many users, since just like mainstream indie devs, this also gives legitimate mobile developers a bad image, as well as the developers lying to many people about their games.

Most asset flips in this market are confirmed to be rip offs of other popular games, with even the devs going as far as to find replications of the original game's assets, even the font.

Google Play is considered by many to be the mobile variant of Steam, as it has been home to tons of shovelware games and even ad-infested apps disguised as games. Another thing is that Steam Direct charges you $100 for every game that you publish, but the Play Store charges you a quarter of Steam Direct's publishing fee once and for all, which has even encouraged more shovelware to be published on the store. Despite all that, Google hasn't even made a move to fight asset flipping.

Videos

Notable asset flippers

Notable Asset flips

This list does count games that have original assets but shamelessly stole a portion of them, such as Revolution 60. This list does not count games that recycled original assets from precursors, such as Metal Gear Survive or Risen 3.

"Original" games

Five Nights at Freddy's fan games

References

See also

Comments

Loading comments...