Talk:The Last of Us Part II

From Qualitipedia
Latest comment: April 3 by Wikiti98 in topic This page should be deleted
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page should be deleted

I don’t understand why this is on bad media, critics give this game universal acclaim, and just because the fans don’t agree with them means that this can be on bad media smh. TheMoonandEarth (talk) 23:48, April 2, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't be look on the critics, just look on the Internet reviewers instead. And i'm placing it this game as Mediocre media. Gamingiq7890 (talk) 23:51, April 2, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why not look on the critics? TheMoonandEarth (talk) 23:52, April 2, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Look at all the other pages of acclaimed media, they’re on good media, so why can’t this? TheMoonandEarth (talk) 23:55, April 2, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
These was a corrupted critics, they paid by Sony to give this game positive reviews. And why this has so many awards and then why people hate so much. I'm feel mixed bag about this game. While this game has good graphics and core gameplay is great, the story and character personality is opposite. And that's this page to be the Mediocre media category. Gamingiq7890 (talk) 23:57, April 2, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The word corrupt critics is overused and doesn’t make sense, it’s not like they are horrible people. TheMoonandEarth (talk) 23:59, April 2, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think you just talk to SuperStreetKombat instead. Gamingiq7890 (talk) 00:01, April 3, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But internet reviews can be biased as well and are not always reliable. Remember that the last of us part 2 got severely review bombed as a many of the reviews involved were fake and came from people who have not actually played the game. Wikiti98 (talk) 15:11, April 3, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, there are TONS of instances where a game was well-recieved by critics and journalists, but not fans, which is usually an indicator that the game isn't as good as journos make it out to be. Other examples besides The Last of Us Part II include Halo 5, Final Fantasy 13, Soul Calibur V, Street Fighter X Tekken, etc. Plus, it's sometimes better to look at YouTube videos of reviewers who are just one person and not part of a company (most notably AngryJoe), as well as forums and blogs from various other websites on why a certain game is or isn't good because a lot of times, they can give out better-seasoned details on a game's overall quality than any journalist at IGN, Polygon, or even Kotaku since the people at those companies can be rather biased and give out stupid reasons on why a certain game is good or bad. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 00:19, April 3, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, SSK, you're really smart. Gamingiq7890 (talk) 00:31, April 3, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's a compliment and not sarcasm, right? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 00:47, April 3, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We're still fighting like 10 year old boys on a playground? Drag0n (talk) 04:51, April 3, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Look if critics and fans are split on something that’s fine but what is not fine is the amount of toxic behavior from haters that has been surrounding this game. Lately there has been a lot of bullying and harassment towards the people involved with this game and people who do like part 2. This kind of behavior is not okay as Abby’s voice actress, Laura Bailey received death threats just because she voiced a certain character. This kind of behavior has got to stop as harassing actors and actresses for roles in unacceptable. Wikiti98 (talk) 03:49, April 3, 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I'm well aware of the toxicity surrounding the haters of this game and how they treated Laura Bailey, and what they did to her was awful. However, we, the users on this wiki, are not those particular haters, because we ourselves don't send death threats to voice actors or anybody else related to games generally disliked by the media because we (or at least we SHOULD) do our best to be objective about a game's quality in terms of gameplay and story and give fair and constructive criticism about them. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 10:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Isn’t the bad ratings from the game mostly come from review bombing? The original does have 5.8 whereas the remaster does have 8.4. Also NBA 2K23 who have a good article there does have a user score of 4.4. Arth2003 (talk) 12:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)