Talk:Qualitipedia Wiki/Archive 1

This page is an archive, and is not meant to be modified! Content is saved here for future reference.

Need help making a page about a plane crash documentary series

Hello, I'm planelovinghistorian17. I would like to make a page talking about a plane crash series Called Mayday(also known as Air Disasters and Air Crash Investigation in other countries) A Canadian documentary series about various types of aviation accidents. The series has been going on since 2003, it's been well received. Though it has taken a small decline in quality twice.(The first when they began making there series a documentary only after Season 4, the second is when they started remaking older episodes in Season 22) So I think it should be here.

Hello!

Hello, I'm Szczypak64(formely known as Szczypak2005) and I can help you make this place as good as possible. Szczypak 64 14:32. 03,12,022 (GMT+2)

Can someone please import all of these pages from Qualitipedia?

Can someone please import all of these pages from Qualitipedia? I would love for all of the SpongeBob SquarePants, Mario The Simpsons, among other pages from those wikis to be imported here. MarioBobFan (talk) 03:47, December 18, 2022 (UTC)

Having both good and bad media in only one place is a bad idea

It is confusing and having wikis separated for both is better HeavenSmile18 (talk) 01:22, December 27, 2022 (UTC)

The organizational issue could be solved by having "Good media" and "Bad media" categories, but that would take a lot of effort to implement those categories into currently existing pages. Tali64³ (talk) 03:56, December 27, 2022 (UTC)

Can we Add NFTs to the Bad Section of this wiki?

I know websites are banned on this wiki but We all hate NFTs right? So how about we make a page about NFTs and why they are bad?

I understand but we do not need to bring up “NFTS are bad for our environment. Anyone who’s an NFT supporter sucks, blah blah, blah” for the uptenth time. Saying these things can get annoying after a while. If anything, it should go under the Forbidden Pages section of the main page.

Which other pages should I import here?

Hey guys. I and Blastoise made tons of imports and asked OA to import huge pages. But I don't know what pages I should import anymore. Could someone suggest me which pages should I import? CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 15:21, January 3, 2023 (UTC)

Question about age requirement.

How old do users have to be to use this? CZ2746isback (talk) 13:20, January 13, 2023 (UTC)

Users must be 13 years old in order to contribute in the wikis. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 13:24, January 13, 2023 (UTC)

Whelp, I'm 12, good to know. (My birthday is June 5). CZ2746isback (talk) 13:26, January 13, 2023 (UTC)

I need some help with importing the Sonic the Hedgehog (2020) page.

For whatever reason, when I try importing that page, it seemingly doesn't import for no good reason at all, and I need someone to fix this. MarioBobFan (talk) 20:07, January 22, 2023 (UTC)

All the wiki's are lost

All of the reception wiki's are lost now, and it mostly became lost media in internets kind

Enough of this.

This is extremely important. This is not a joke. Look at yourselves. Because of this, Qualitipedia is hated by everyone. Qualitipedia is being ranted because of extremely toxic community. So this what you all should do now. Improve and take critism easily. Do not start drama. Do not unfairly block someone. We even damaged Miraheze's reputation. And do not even try to block me. Because this is important.

We're going to listen to criticism but...what you said was very odd. Trying to block you? Unfairly blocking? Dude, we're not going to do that. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 14:56, January 29, 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for listening anyway. - VoltKarma2

all of us are Psychos

Some of the pages I was able to find through Wayback Machine

Here are some of the pages I was able to save and find through Wayback Machine. I hope these help. https://web.archive.org/web/20221214222643/https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/wiki/Angel_Cop https://web.archive.org/web/20221127120431/https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/wiki/Category:Anime https://web.archive.org/web/20221207002243/https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/wiki/Aggretsuko_%28season_4%29 https://web.archive.org/web/20221215212552/https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/wiki/Sailor_Moon_%28DiC/Cloverway_dub%29 https://web.archive.org/web/20221214223641/https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/wiki/Arifureta:_From_Commonplace_to_World%27s_Strongest I will put more on later. But I hope this helps a bit. Agarfinkel (talk) 00:06, January 30, 2023 (PST)

Should Rage 2 be made on the positive perspective or negative persepective?

Hello guys. I want to make a page about Rage 2, but I'm confused: The Metacritic score states it has a mixed reception but based on my research, people are claiming it's underrated and also gained cult following. Where should the page go? Good media or Bad media? CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 18:08, January 30, 2023 (UTC)

Good media i think Robin1020th (talk) 21:35, July 25, 2023 (UTC)

I was worried about the users

When this New home of Reception wiki's came, I was still worried that the users are going to be the same as they were, like if they were mentally I'll or 13 year olds run this site.

Don't worry, we're making sure we're going to avoid that. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 18:20, January 30, 2023 (UTC)

I could not believe that people are acting crazy in other wiki sites, forcing their "good" movies to be "Good"

why do people make fun of them?

Why Do people like to make fun in the section in reception wiki pages like Generic title and logo that looks like it was made by a kindergarten student"

Believe it or not

All of us are Maniacs, I WOULD NOT BELIEVE WHAT WE BECAME OF.

Anastasia

Please give Anastasia a page on New Qualitipedia.

I just literally want to make the downfall of HBO MAX

Because its going to close soon, i wanted to make it

Uh, sure, why not? It's related to TV and Movies, so.... CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 19:55, February 21, 2023 (UTC)

Disable page creation for anonymous and unconfirmed users

Since New Qualitipedia is currently suffering from a spam attack, I propose that the ability for anonymous and unconfirmed users to create pages be removed. Here's my reasoning for doing so:

1. All the current spam here comes from anonymous users. Not once have I seen a registered user post something like that.
2. Preventing unconfirmed users from creating pages as well prevents the spammers from simply creating an account to bypass the restriction. I know this contradicts what I said above, so this doesn't have to go into effect right away. If registered accounts start spamming, then this can be done.

Overall, this will stop at least 99% of the spam coming here, so we can contribute without stuff about events going on in Turkiye or some other foreign country bothering us. Normal page editing will still be unrestricted for anonymous/unconfirmed users as before. Tali64³ (talk) 19:48, February 22, 2023 (UTC)

Update: Now we're getting registered spambots. I actually think that restricting page creation to autoconfirmed users only is now too harsh, as many users would be locked out; maybe we can enable an extension such as Moderation to patrol new page creation (it's currently not in ManageWiki, but an administrator can request that Original Authority add it there)? I've been marking each spam page for deletion, but I just accidentally tripped an abuse filter for trying to mark a spambot's page for deletion. Tali64³ (talk) 23:43, February 22, 2023 (UTC)

@Tali64³: Deleted the spam and added the ConfirmEdit extension, which should theoretically slow spam bots down. I've tracked this issue in Phorge, here, please do comment on the task if you have any other suggestions, or in anyway agree or disagree with said proposed solutions. --Original Authority (talk) 03:07, February 23, 2023 (UTC)

Apparently, it didn't, because you deleted more spam and revoked the createpage and edit rights from anonymous users. Although I agree with removing createpage rights, I disagree with removing edit rights. Most anonymous edits to existing pages were constructive contributions from real users, so they should still be allowed to edit; on the other hand, most anonymous page creations were spam from spammers, so it makes sense to revoke the createpage rights from anonymous users. Tali64³ (talk) 13:44, February 24, 2023 (UTC)

@Tali64³: If you don't thing that ConfirmEdit has been effective, please do leave a reply on Phorge if you have some alternate proposal. I've added back the edit rights to anons --Original Authority (talk) 08:23, February 25, 2023 (UTC)

Since I get an unhandled exception when I try to register for Phorge, I'm leaving my reply here. You could enable the StopForumSpam extension, which automatically blocks IPs from spammers. Tali64³ (talk) 18:37, February 25, 2023 (UTC)

Adding Pages Of More British Children's Programmes.

We should add more page of programmes on CITV and CBBC.

Some programmes on CITV Grizzy Tales for Gruesome Kids (1999-2006) Bernard's Watch (1997-2001, 2004-2005) My Parents are Aliens (1999-2006) Jungle Run (1999-2006) My Phone Genie (2011)

Some Programmes on CBBC Wolfblood (2012-2014, 2016-2017) Jamie Johnson (2016-2022) World's End (2015) MI High (2007-2011, 2013-2014) Sparticle Mystery (2011, 2013, 2015) Young Dracula (2006-2008, 2011-2012, 2014) The Story of Tracy Beaker (2002-2005) Dani's House (2008-2012) Dani's Castle/ Rich, Jimmy & Kait's Castle (2013-2015) Millie Inbetween (2014-2017) The Dumping Ground (2013-) The Sarah Jane Adventures (2007-2011) Wizards vs Aliens (2012-2014) Tracy Beaker Returns (2010-2012) Dead Gorgeous (2010) Sadie J (2011-2013) The 4'O Clock Club (2012-2020) Hank Zipzer (2014-2016) Eve (2015-2016) Horrible Histories Live action (2009-2013, 2015-?) Hetty Feather (2015-2019) Almost Never (2019-2021) So Awkward (2015-2020) Still So Awkward (2021-) Stepping Up (2012) Strange Hill High (2013-2014) Class Dismissed (2015-) Scream Street (2015-2017, 2021) Dennis the Menace UK (1996-1998) Dennis and Gnasher/Dennis the Menace and Gnasher UK(2009-2010, 2013) Dennis & Gnasher: Unleased UK (2017-2018, 2020-2021)

There are many more shows will be added if there is enough agreement. And I will give information about some these shows or it can be researched on the internet. Please comment if you agree. If there is enough agreement across the collective wiki then possible reasonable reasons of bad and good qualities of the programmes will be made in a another topic (Anyone who knows and saw these programmes can make reasonable reasons for good and bad qualities of these shows, however kind genuine discussions must be made about whether a programme belongs in Terrible TV Shows Wiki or in Best TV Shows Wiki) before making wiki pages for these programmes. Thank you for reading.

Um...hey, everybody.

It's been months or weeks since the site has been shut down. Look, I may be a flawed guy, but I will learn from my mistakes from now on.

Uh....ok? Wdym with your mistakes? What did you do exactly? CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 08:49, March 5, 2023 (UTC)

how do you add pages here

tell me please i want to add pages here

Marxo Grouch

Is he here? I need to talk to him does he have any social media?Singlestuforeo (talk) 10:51, March 18, 2023 (UTC)

The user you are talking about has long since left these areas, maybe that's a good thing because there's no use for those people anyway. Szczypak 64 19:13 March 18 2023 (GMT+2)

do you know where I can find him?Singlestuforeo (talk) 13:01, March 22, 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately I don't know, and I don't know why you want to talk to him since he's already left Qualitipedia and he seems to be inactive on Miraheze for a while, so I really... have no idea where you can contact him. Szczypak 64 14:48 March 22 2023 (GMT+2)

Viewing Website On Smartphones

The site is kind of hard to view on a smartphone. It’s kind of scrunched and messy. Is there a way to improve it?

Can you post an example of what you're seeing? And on which page(s)? --Original Authority (talk) 03:48, March 22, 2023 (UTC)

Can someone please help me with this article?

== Can someone please help me with this article? == https://newqualitipedia.telepedia.net/wiki/User:NewMarioBobFan/sandbox/The_Super_Mario_Bros._Movie#Why_This_Movie_Might_Be_Super . It's because of the fact that I am trying to rush the article. Also, I remember helping The Dunkman with his Sonic the Hedgehog article on the Greatest Movies Wiki, and I trying to add a bunch of pointers in my sandbox. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 22:35, March 23, 2023 (UTC)

Can pages of positive celebrities be added here?

Because of the fact that they really didn't cause any drama and were simply pages of praising people. Also, the RFC that SuperStreetKombat made about reading the pages on the positive wikis succeeded, so... I also have a bunch of celebrities I could add here. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 01:11, April 3, 2023 (UTC)

Not a good idea. Even a well-intentioned plan, such as positive celebrity pages, can likely get out of control with some less than caring users. Also, even some of the friendliest or most famous celebs out there are bond to have some dark secret or suspicious actions. Public images and off camera images are 2 completely different things. SpaceProtagonist (talk) 16:08, April 3, 2023 (UTC)

Why can't I log in to my account on my phone?

I actually tried it a few times, but it doesn't work. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 19:26, April 16, 2023 (UTC)

@MarioBobFan, this was due to an upstream issue with CentralAuth and MobileFrontend that wasn't backported to MediaWiki 1.39 when the fix was made for 1.40; it has now been fixed and I have tested it. -- Original Authority (talk) 19:22, May 31, 2023 (UTC)

xXx: State of the Union

Are there pages that are still importing? If so, I hope they finish soon, as I am dying to see that xXx: State of the Union page.

Should we add Strange World onto this wiki?

Even though the movie's an underrated movie for most, I think an article on it could work. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 03:37, May 5, 2023 (UTC)

I agree NewMarioBobFan. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 03:49, May 11, 2023 (UTC)

Rule #11 being ignored and broken

This message is likely gonna be ignored but imma say it anyways and I hope I don't get harassed or banned for this. After lurking in these wikis for a while, I noticed that this rule is being ignored and broken by a lot of users as some pages still use the term "SJW", and some pointers of said articles still have signs of right-wing bias on it despite this wiki claiming to be "not politically driven". I get that a lot of users here are right-wing leaning and are heavily against these types of people anyways, but what happened to "leaving the left and right alone"? Weren't those the words that the original founder of the original version of the wikis said if you're gonna help fix the damages that the original wikis caused? It's probably not that hard to criticize a piece of media without having to attack either sides of the spectrum nor (in)directly relate it to politics whatsoever. I'm just saying, as someone who is apolitical... March0307 (talk) 03:40, May 16, 2023 (UTC) Hello. Yes, I'm aware that some pages still use the word "SJW", and I was planning to make a mass removal of the usage of this term from the imported pages. You said that it's not hard to criticize political content while beng apolitical. In reality, this is incredibly hard, because when I was writing The Proud Family reboot page, I tried way too hard to write it in an apolitical way, without spitting idiocy from the right-wing. I also need help from other users for this mass removal. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 04:35, May 16, 2023 (UTC)

Should the Toy Story 4 page be revised as a "bad" article?

Before I say what I really want to get into, yes, I, FreezingTNT, am back. Anyway, what I really want to say here is that while Toy Story 4 has been praised by critics and audiences, it does have problems.

Please, have a watch:

Load video

YouTube

YouTube might collect personal data. Privacy Policy

ContinueDismiss

Load video

YouTube

YouTube might collect personal data. Privacy Policy

ContinueDismiss

Load video

YouTube

YouTube might collect personal data. Privacy Policy

ContinueDismiss

Load video

YouTube

YouTube might collect personal data. Privacy Policy

ContinueDismiss

Load video

YouTube

YouTube might collect personal data. Privacy Policy

ContinueDismiss

Or, if you want to watch it all in one video, here's a supercut of the above series:

Load video

YouTube

YouTube might collect personal data. Privacy Policy

ContinueDismiss

FreezingTNT (talk) 16:33, May 24, 2023 (UTC)

Can Someone Make The MLB The Show 23 Page

Despite 2.1 Stars On Google 2 stars on XBOX Mlb The show 23 Recived Positive User Score On MetaCrtic For the ps5 version And second of all I Don’t Really know how to make pages

Just make it yourself or otherwise just don't let everyone make this page for you. JustNothing (talk) 23:29, July 15, 2023 (UTC)

Should NBA2K23 Be A Decent Article Or A Bad Article?

There’s Mixed To Positive Crtic Reviews But Sub Par User Reviews on meta crtic Because of the overpriced vc at launch. So I’m just asking If it should be decent article or not. --ChessGuy66 (talk) 16:22, June 9, 2023 (UTC)

Import pages from CGW

I found a archive of the 1st 500 categories of the wiki.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220804033627/https://crappygames.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Categories&offset=&limit=500

I found categories for AMW and TTS&EW

https://web.archive.org/web/20220803233851/https://awfulmovies.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Categories&offset=&limit=250

https://web.archive.org/web/20220804002317/https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Categories&offset=&limit=100

You guys didn't do a good job archiving everything.

Thoughts on the Flash movie? Does it belong on Qualitipedia?

I have mostly seen negative reviews and little to no positive reviews. What do you guys think of the movie? --Blackstar0444 (talk) 16:31, June 17, 2023 (UTC)

What about Elemental? It needs a page. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 16:49, June 17, 2023 (UTC)

That as well, but make it neutral since I see both positive and mixed reviews. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 20:03, June 22, 2023 (UTC)

Characters being allowed

• I feared this day would come sooner or later. A key reason I left the character wikis back on Miraheze was because I realized it was getting too out of hand -- especially on the negative wiki, where some of character pages were either hate pages, didn't properly explain why the character was supposedly disliked, or about detestable characters we're supposed to hate, that aren't even that poorly-written. If we're going to allow character pages on this system, we're going to have to set some ground rules. SpaceProtagonist (talk) 19:07, June 17, 2023 (UTC)
  • First off: Try to avoid putting in too many characters intended to be disliked (unless they're disliked for some other reason) as the character's fulfilling their role in the work, and typically doesn't deserve unfair hatred. For instance, irredeemable monsters such as Griffith from Berserk, Johan Liebert from Monster, The Plutonian from Irredeemable, or Emperor Belos from The Owl House shouldn't be labelled as bad characters by default, just because of their instance depravity. These 4 villains are all three-dimensional, compelling presences, and beloved by both critics and audiences. That being said, complexity's not necessarily a requirement to be compelling and well-written (i.e.: Emperor Palpatine from Star Wars), but villains with no characterization other than pure evil may need a discussion before deciding whether they're good, or bad, or even interesting characters (Fire Lord Ozai from Avatar: The Last Airbender, Muzan Kibutsuji from Demon Slayer and Nemesis from the titular comic) My advice: If you're going to add a monstrous villain to the "bad characters" section, try using villains that are boring and/or poorly-written such as Don Thousand from Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL, MCU Malekith from Thor: The Dark World, or Robin King from Dark Nights: Death Metal) SpaceProtagonist (talk)
  • Second: Make sure the negative pages actually provide valid context as to why the character's disliked, and isn't just a stub. That way readers feel like the editor actually has a good idea of what they're talking about, and is judging the character fairly.
  • I've got some additional ideas, but it can't quite remember them all at the moment.

Can the metacrtic page me made?

Theres a metacrtic page on here but theres no why its rotten and reedeeming qualites on it.--TheSportsGamer 05:47, June 25, 2023 (UTC)

Why aren't the files working?

On every page, it shows the files names, but they are all broken. Hopefully, this gets fixed. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 18:12, June 25, 2023 (UTC)

About copy/paste pages

I feel like we should try and export the source .xml files from the Wayback Machine, and import them here just so the revisions will line up so we won't end up deleting pages like these. -Blastoise

Question

Is plagiarizing the page from old miraheze websites by using Wayback Machine allowed or not?

If plagiarizing you mean copy pasting then no, it's not allowed. The pages copy pasted before the rule was implemented (March 16th, 2023) are allowed to stay here. The main reason why I prohibited it is because it defeats the purpose of rebooting a wiki.

Oh sorry, I wasn’t aware of this rule and since I’m new and saw some pages being copied. Can I edit my 2 pages I have created to make the words my own. Again, I present my apologies

Tell me which page is, which I will move it to your sandbox, and then you can change it entirely. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 16:22, July 2, 2023 (UTC)

Super Mario 3D Land and 3D World I am Arth2003

Character.ai

Should it be in good media or bad media? --Blackstar0444 (talk) 00:00, July 6, 2023 (UTC) Idk--ChessGuy66 (talk) 22:48, July 8, 2023 (UTC)

Would NHL 23 (If it was on here) be average page or below average or lower page?

With a 70 on metacrtic from critics 2.6 and 1.8 for ps5 and Xbox series x respectively, It also is getting poor reactions a from some hockey fans.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 22:51, July 8, 2023 (UTC) I enjoy the game despite knowing its poorly Recived by users--ChessGuy66 (talk) 22:51, July 8, 2023 (UTC)

Discord server

Do we have a Discord server? Because the one link from this website doesn’t work and it says that it was expired

It would be cool if we did. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 21:33, July 25, 2023 (UTC)

Um, hello.

Hello, JustNothing here. I'm just... you wanna talk with me? JustNothing (talk) 16:02, July 14, 2023 (UTC)

Arth2003 If there is a discord server then yes. But is it the only way to talks with us?

How awful is this show on HBO?

Alright there's this show called "The Idol" on HBO staring Abel Tesfaye (The Weeknd) and Lily-Rose Depp and um... where can I say this? Has some scathing reviews from critic and audiences. So is everyone gonna create a page in it on New Qualitpedia? JustNothing (talk) 14:51, July 15, 2023 (UTC) It’s already here.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 17:06, July 15, 2023 (UTC)

Umm... Okay, I'm just checking out. Is the page good tho? JustNothing (talk) 18:46, July 15, 2023 (UTC)

Just checked out this page few seconds later and it's subpar. JustNothing (talk) 18:48, July 15, 2023 (UTC)

I made the page a while ago, my bad, JustNothing. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 21:33, July 25, 2023 (UTC)

Movies that deserve to be added on this wiki.

Shrek(2001) Shrek 2(2004) Shrek The Third(2007) Shrek Forever After(2010) Puss In Boots(2011) Puss In Boots:The Last Wish(2022) The Bad Guys(2022) Black Adam(2022) DC League of Super Pets(2022) Shang-Chi and The Legend of The Ten Rings(2021) Spider-Man:Homecoming(2017) Spider-Man:Far From Home(2019) Spider-Man:No Way Home(2021) Venom(2018) Venom:Let There Be Carnage(2021) Guillermo Del Toro’s Pinocchio(2022) Disenchanted(2022) Cruella(2021) Pinocchio(2022) Top Gun(1986) Top Gun:Maverick(2022) Sonic The Hedgehog 2(2022) Doctor Strange(2016) Doctor Strange and The Multiverse of Madness(2022) Wakanda Forever(2022) M3GAN(2023) Guardians of The Galaxy(2014) Guardians of The Galaxy,Volume 2(2017) Guardians of The Galaxy,Volume 3(2023) Knock at The Cabin(2023) Free Guy(2021) The Call of The Wild(2020) Avatar:The Way of Water(2022) Dune(2021) The Suicide Squad(2021) Shazam(2019) Shazam:Fury of The Gods(2023) Godzilla(1998) Godzilla(2014) Kong:Skull Island(2017) Godzilla:King of The Monsters(2019) Godzilla Vs. Kong(2021) SCOOB(2020) Trolls:World Tour(2020) Elemental(2023) Strange World(2022) Turning Red(2022) Luca(2021) Encanto(2021) Raya and The Last Dragon(2021) Onward(2020) Soul(2020) Star Wars:The Force Awakens(2015) Star Wars:The Last Jedi(2017) Star Wars:The Rise of Skywalker(2019) Indiana Jones and The Dial of Destiny(2023) Scream(2022) Scream VI(2023) Black Panther(2018) Black Panther:Wakanda Forever(2022) Ant Man(2015) Ant Man and the Wasp(2018) Ant Man and the Wasp:Quantumania(2023) The Haunted Mansion(2003) 96.61.19.243 22:50, July 15, 2023 (UTC)

That's cool but what about Barbie? --Blackstar0444 (talk) 21:31, July 25, 2023 (UTC)

OK, but which one should is bad and not: i do think Turning Red clearly deserves to be on bad media. Robin1020th (talk) 21:34, July 25, 2023 (UTC)

Are you crazy? I'm pretty sure that Turning Red should be in good media, it gets way too much hate for such a film. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 16:47, July 26, 2023 (UTC)

It's really cringy and i saw the movie especially, the final battle has mei is outright twerking at her mom, damn. Robin1020th (talk) 21:34, July 25, 2023 (UTC)

About Naruto Shippuden

Would we have a page for NS in good media, but the seasons involving fillers and Kaguya arc would be on average? Arth2003

Lets see, should Clone High (Season 2) be good media or bad media?

I'll let you guys decide, I have seen both good and bad reviews. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 16:50, July 26, 2023 (UTC)

Good media --Robin (talk) 16:50, July 26, 2023 (UTC)

A lot of the reviews on IMDB as of recent are 6/10-1/10, so I'll make it bad media instead.

bad movies that deserve to be added to this wiki.

• Despicable Me 1 & 2
• Inside Out
• Toy Story 1
• Ratatouille
• The Lego Movie 1 & 2

LioToad (talk) 20:41, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

Umm, i dont see how these movies are bad, also we already have the whole Toy Story movies as good media. Robin (talk) 18:02, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

How about The Lego Movie (ugh...that movie just looks stupid & unfunny altogether) LioToad (talk) 21:31, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

Eh, the second movie maybe, i did saw the first one and it was ok for the most part, though both movies were received good, though i do have a list of actual bad movies i have it on my shitscale. Robin1020th (talk) 21:33, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

• A Good Day to Die Hard
• Taken 3
• Die Another Day
• Men of Steel (2013)
• Batman v Supermam: Dawn of Justice
• Alien: Resurrection and Covenant
• Any Home Alone Movie after the first three
• Star Wars Disney Sequels
• The Emoji Movie
• Cuties
• Any Disney Live Action Reboots/Remakes
• Son of the Mask
• Jack & Jill
• The Lorax (2012)
• The Grinch (2018)
• The Last Airbender (2010)
• Ice Age Continental Drift, Collision Course and *The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild
• Agent Cody Banks 2
• Robocop (2014)
• The Wild
• Norm of the North series
• Every video game movie adaptation
• The Boss Baby series
• Independence Day 2: Resurgence
• Speed 2: Cruise Control
• The Avengers (1998) Robin1020th (talk) 21:33, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

And Batman & Robin movie Robin1020th (talk) 21:37, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

How about Ron's Gone Wrong? That movie had extremely unlikable characters, unfunny and obnoxious humor. Oh, and the Tikitiki song. That song's lyrics were so annoying and weird. LioToad (talk) 21:41, July 27, 2023 (UTC) Ron’s gone wrong got good reviews--ChessGuy66 (talk) 21:44, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

I didn't see the movie yet, although i am surprised how this got good reviews.

Anyway there are lots of bad movies that are actually bad and got low reception, most of them that i named are from 90s for exemple, i am sure you can do better than that Robin1020th (talk) 21:44, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

i watched so many movies from older years Robin1020th (talk) 21:46, July 27, 2023 (UTC)

There's also the awful live action Inspect Gadget that came out in 1998 and the sequel that came out in 2003, although the sequel is a small improvement over the first film, but not by much. Robin1020th (talk) 21:48, July 27, 2023 (UTC) we should add ant man and the wasp 2023 and the flash movie here.--ChessGuy66 (talk)

I don't really see why Ron's Gone Wrong should be a bad page. It's actually a good movie and had a page on the Greatest Movies Wiki.

blue's clues

Can someone add the page for Blue's Clues ?LioToad (talk) 19:08, July 28, 2023 (UTC)

Uh... you can add it yourself --Blackstar0444 (talk) 22:08, July 29, 2023 (UTC)

My wiki version

For those who don't like the rules of this wiki, I've created my own alternative called "The New Crappy Games Wiki" which (at the moment) is gaming only and is private as Miraheze forbids receiving wikis) Link is here but you will need to provide account names so I can give you permissions and the link is: https://szczypak64.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page

If you have a question, you can ask me. Szczypak 64 12:01, August 05 2023 (GMT+2)

I don't expect the wiki to last much longer, considering that it's a reception wiki that was presented as a personal opinion wiki on the request (I didn't feel that it would violate the ban on new reception wikis when I approved it, which it definitely does now) and CJ has made a report about the wiki on Meta. Tali64³ (talk) 15:16, August 5, 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know Tali, you can apply for membership privileges in return. Szczypak 64 18:47, August 05 2023 (GMT+2)

The Dreaded Character Wikis

To this day, I still can't believe that the character wikis are the sole survivors of the Miraheze Wiki Purge. Let's just say there's a reason I left those wikis years ago, especially the Loathsome Characters wiki. Multiple actually. While it's true that I used to be an active user who was just as bad as a lot of the others in creating biased pages for undeserving, I soon realized the wrong I was doing, regretted my actions, and tried to make amends, partially by doing characters who actually deserved to be on there. But that didn't stop a bunch of other users from continuing the trend, especially with villains and Hate Sinks -- who are supposed to be disliked and half the time aren't even poorly-written. (Heck, Miguel O'Hara from Across the Spider-Verse used to have a page on there. No joke!) Plus they also misused the Generic Doomsday Villain, and Complete Monster tropes for villains they personally found boring or detestable. Some of the "monsters" they have are Tomoo, Post-Season 8 Peter Griffin, Flanderized Mr. Krabs, APC Ren, some spoiled kid named Louie Farley and Xena and Xavier from Odd Squad (I wish I were making this up.) None of the guys are anywhere close to being Pure Evil. Again they're being biased, and even if I take them off, the cycle could just start back up again. I refused to be involved with those wikis. SpaceProtagonist (talk) 13:03, August 5, 2023 (UTC)

Ladies and Gentleman

I'm planning to overturn this ban on new reception wikis, so if you want that to happen, please support this RFC. link: https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Talk:Miraheze Szczypak 64 13:05, August 06 2023 (GMT+2)

Question

Does Telepedia have an option to turn on blogs? I'm asking because I want to make a blog for an awful film that I made up. If so, could someone who has the ability to turn them on do so please? FullInterTurn (talk) 18:10, August 21, 2023 (UTC)

Can we add Strays as a good article

Strays recently came out, it does have a few good reviews on YouTube

Very weird question.

does anyone who agrees what this wiki says will dress up as the AVGN and the Nostalgia Critic and make anybody shocked in silence as if whoever watches the SpongeBob Nostalgia Critic episode? 173.238.230.221 (talk) 00:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLUkgRAy_Vo Money12123 (contribs | sandbox) 01:22, August 27, 2023 (UTC)

We should stop putting "This (insert type of media here) is extremely controversial and therefore no positive qualities should be added" in some articles.

I perfectly know why they put that disclaimer but we should stop doing it since it makes the articles look biased and nobody is defending those horrible media, even if the media the article criticizes is bad and has malicious propaganda. Just because someone adds redeeming qualities doesn't mean they is defending it as those articles are criticizing those media.

I don't want to be misunderstood, I just want to improve this wiki. MandalorePrinny (talk) 03:07, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

You're actually right. Ngl, I thought I was the only one that was kinda bothered by these notes when I first saw them in the original Qualitipedia wikis. I would also like to add that while said media are controversial, in the end, they're still not meant to be taken too seriously as they're only movies/games/tv shows/etc. Snow (talk) 03:19, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

And the Fox News article still has Redeeming Qualities despite that they defended the Russian invasion of Ukraine. MandalorePrinny (talk) 03:23, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

Well that's some double standards there. It's okay to add redeeming qualities if you do it to some biased News Station or Network. But not in any controversial movies/tv shows/games? It shows that the users here take the media they criticize too seriously. Snow (talk) 03:38, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

The main reason why those disclaimers are added is because if we add redeeming qualities, it doesn't feel like we're taking stuff like propaganda, rape and pedophilia seriously. I'll be more lenient towards certain pages like 13 Reasons Why, Fox News and Skillz, but for pages like Tomorrow's Pioneers, Boku no Pico, Cuties and RapeLay, don't even bother asking those, because if you'll ask it constantly, you will instantly get a temporary ban. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 07:48, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

Just because a page criticizing a media with malicious propaganda contains redeeming qualities doesn't mean we are taking them seriously. I am aware of what those media promote but what if someone adds a valid redeeming quality? If you forgot I DO NOT DEFEND THOSE HORRID MEDIA, NOBODY IS DEFENDING THEM!. MandalorePrinny (talk) 21:41, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

Alright. That's understandable. I can see why those media you said are controversial (which I agree on, especially with those three you mentioned). Though I wish users didn't abuse the warning by adding it on tamer pieces of media. I think that was what OP meant by the criticism of the warning. Maybe this can be a rule that you might consider imposing here? Up to you though since its your wiki after all. Snow (talk) 09:43, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

Does The Happening count as an media that promotes suicide? It's an M Night Syamalan film that became a meme. Robin (talk) 10:12, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

Uh...Idk. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 10:12, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

No, just because it depicts scenes of suicide doesn't mean it promotes it. MandalorePrinny (talk) 21:43, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

It's a movie about people commiting suicide for some reason, although the way they do commit suicide is laughably funny, the same goes for the dialogues, espeically Mark Wahlberg. Robin (talk) 10:12, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

Nah, too ridiculous for it to promote suicide. I don't think the laughable scenes of people committing suicide is considered promoting. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 10:19, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

https://youtu.be/gF96Tk2SlKU?si=I1Mdo8MHppSaZmHd this is the whole movie, atleast a review actually. Robin (talk) 10:22, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

Alright, I'm starting to understand why you guys are so critical towards various films, shows and games with a lot of disturbing content. However, it seems that various users are adding disturbing pages on purpose just to balance out the bad content (to the point where there are arguably more bad media pages than good media pages). If this is going to continue, I believe we're going to have to set a limit over the type of material that's to be allowed on this service... especially if it'll eventually be viewed thousands of outsiders.

We don't want readers to come across pages about works that consist entirely of explicit sex or other fetishistic stuff, without a proper story. Or pages on works that depict sexual activity between children in an explicit manner or in glorifying fashion. Or works with titillating references to sexual activity involving preteens. We need to draw some kind of line if we're to avoid controversy. So tasteless works with an overabundance of porn, sexual assault and pedophilia without a plot or message shouldn't even have pages on here.SpaceProtagonist (talk) 18:10, August 24, 2023 (UTC)

We maybe should do a rfc for this.--CG66 (talk) 00:22, August 25, 2023 (UTC)

No, I'll keep it as it is. Snow gave me a better tip on this. Plus, adding redeeming qualities on pages like Cuties and Tomorrow's Pioneers literally got a lot of flack in the original QP, so we must avoid that. I don't want to talk about this anymore. End of story! CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 07:41, August 25, 2023 (UTC)

Apology note.

To whom it may concern.

I didn’t realize what I was doing… *sigh* I’m sorry for everything I did. Can we call a whole bet off? Is there anything I can do? Please let me take back what I say.

Can the protection to Migration please be removed?

My sandbox has been locked, and the protection should be removed. It's completely ironic that this happened, considering that The Super Mario Bros. Movie and Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken weren't protected. I am also completely mad at this. Also, it's gonna make my process take even longer. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 00:02, August 31, 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that, i put the protection there because the movie didn't even got released yet, also one of the users suggested that it should be protected, anyway i removed it as of now. Robin (talk) 06:16, August 31, 2023 (UTC)

A serious important message.

For those of you who don’t understand what I’m saying. Qualitipedia is now in a really, really, really, really low budget. That means later this wiki is going to look really, really cheap like the other reception wikis. Here. Let me explain. Unlike having an encyclopedia wiki, having a reception wiki can be fun in terms of creativity. But unless you review or see what movie was or play a game and see you like it or not or if you get paid to do this, you’re absolutely making no money or profit whatsoever. I mean, the wikis are always been done on a low budget. Man, all the articles have been made with Bad and Good Qualities parts on them. But due to rough economic times, these articles has to be done fast and with no money. (Sigh)

Number 1: by taking criticism easily, so that means you’re gonna go easy on the ratings, by checking how the Show and the Game and the Film turned out.

Number 2: Some old receptions wikis that are at least been biased have been ranted on. And uh, here are the links to the example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQMouH3jXlg

http://tiresomewikis.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Qualitipedia_and_the_Original_Reception_Wikis_(2019-present)

Yeah. It happened too fast. Because the… negative feedback has been sent to them.

You can’t even afford any of these forbidden pages to be showing up on the wikis. Which is strange because one of it says that All the FNAF Games had mixed reviews and considered a great franchise. Here are the links to the examples.

https://newqualitipedia.telepedia.net/wiki/Five_Nights_at_Freddy%27s_(Clickteam_era)

https://newqualitipedia.telepedia.net/wiki/Five_Nights_at_Freddy%27s:_Sister_Location

https://newqualitipedia.telepedia.net/wiki/Five_Nights_at_Freddy%27s:_Security_Breach

https://newqualitipedia.telepedia.net/wiki/Five_Nights_at_Freddy%27s_fan_games

Since you put FNAF in the forbidden pages, then I saw that’s just a suspicious thing of you to make an article of the franchise. Select a link and see what I mean.

I’m gonna prove to you that Spongebob made a parody of the Nostalgia Critic episode as the real NC reacted to it, by allowing me to post a link right here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3Gp28oxQyY

See? Go look at what I’m telling you, it’s true. Mostly because it took forever for nickelodeon to know all about the Nostalgia Critic.

And to top it all off, Qualitipedia will be recognized as a series of most Cheapiest and Biased wikis of them all. That means all the people who trusted these wikis are just gonna completely give up on them, And it’ll be resorted for them to read unbiased wikis. So yeah, Qualitipedia is very very poor. I already know that Miraheze’s reputation is already ruined because of those receptions wikis. I’m just feeling so sorry for Miraheze. I know you guys are working hard to make the wikis possible and you didn’t get any financial relief on them. The unbiased wikis are coming out even better since people are paid for them. Telepedia is the only one bought this wiki. Come on, it’s only easy… you can do alot with a small budget on these wikis.

-a certain user

I just said this on the Reception Wikis Wiki, and I'll say it again. First of all, Qualitipedia closed down because there was an RFC that was made in the now closed Qualitipedia Meta where people can vote whether or not the network closes. And most people were in favor of the closure.

Second, what does monetization and budget have to do with Reception Wikis and wiki editing as a whole? People only requested for these wikis to be made here and on Telepedia. And requesting for wikis on Miraheze and Telepedia are free (although the latter is ad-filled). You don't pay or earn money from simply making articles on a free wiki like this one. Therefore, all your claims about "articles being done cheaply" are invalid. Snow (talk) 00:22, September 4, 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, I know… These free wikis are not costing money to even do a cheap advertisement.

(Sees the vision where the New Qualitipedia being ranted on)

Oh, what?! Oh no! Oh ho no! The vision where this Qualitipedia is gonna be ranted on is set in my head! Thanks to… the negative feedback backlash.

I actually see this wiki as being a success, better than the older ones, any problems it has we will fix it, we won't let it die. Robin (talk) 18:35, September 13, 2023 (UTC)

If it does, its grave will be right next to the other grave that says, “Here lies the old biased wikis of Qualitipedia. R.I.P”

So, yeah. You go do that. But if there’s a problem that is a content forked page posted on there, our behinds will get MUGGED UP SO HARD!!

But since this Mr. Exit guy found a list where MoBros keeps tracks of the votes. And the most votes a single episode of SpongeBob got… was 14 votes. He kid us not that there were a hundred episodes that had received at least one vote ranging of the recent episodes of the time all the way back to the pre-film era. Yep… they just got 14 votes.

Question.

Should we change the Sonic the Hedgehog (2020) page to "bad media"? LioToad (talk) 21:41, September 3, 2023 (UTC)

Why? Robin (talk) 21:42, September 3, 2023 (UTC)

Because some people hate it LioToad (talk) 21:46, September 3, 2023 (UTC)

"Some", depends though, is it divisive, since there are some people that actually like this movie too. Robin (talk) 21:48, September 3, 2023 (UTC)

Let's just keep it the way it is. LioToad (talk) 21:50, September 3, 2023 (UTC)

Good idea. Robin (talk) 21:58, September 3, 2023 (UTC)

Robin

I Wish Cj Was Here To Make This Total Drama Page Were Doing Total Drama Later But For Now Maybe Added Some Of The Mcu On There Maybe Add Captain Underpants After One Of The Mcu Films Is Added I Guess Add Which Mcu Film You Want To Add First Which Is One Film At The Moment Then Captain Underpants

Another bad low budget animation film

So uh, a new animated movie titled: "Swan Princess: Far Longer Than Forever" is about to release and from what i saw in the trailer, just like Ivan the Incredible, it's gonna be yet, another awful low budget animation film.

Content of this wiki.

Recently, there has been quite a bit of content on this wiki that falls outside the scope of the wiki. For reference, the wiki when it was created was cited to be about rating the reception of television and movies and as such, pages that are being created here about people that have gone to prison—whether or not they are related to any of the shows on this wiki—are not appropriate. Please refrain from adding these pages to the wiki. --Original Authority (talk) 22:59, September 7, 2023 (UTC)

Should there be a page on Fire Emblem Engage?

If there ends up being a page on that game, I wonder if it will be on the positive or negative side of things

Just noting a minor grammar mistake on the main page

“ it did aired amazing cartoons “ should be “ it did air amazing cartoons “, on the forbidden pages covering 2003 Bom Dom & Cia ( or whatever it’s called ). --

I fixed the typo.

Robin (talk) 08:06, September 9, 2023 (UTC)

Should we add more 2023 movies to the wiki before 2024 comes?

I mean c'mon, there really isn't enough. I can think of Barbie, Haunted Mansion, and The Nun II, but I already wrote those. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 02:05, September 13, 2023 (UTC)

There's still a handful of pages that need to be added here from the archived wikis. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 03:02, September 13, 2023 (UTC) We got elemental, Oppenheimer, blue beetle, the boogeyman 2023, GOTG 3, M3GAN, Plane, and Ant Man and the wasp quantumanin to add here for example.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 00:54, September 26, 2023 (UTC)

Question.

Can someone add Peg + Cat to this wiki (because the show sucks imo) LioToad (talk) 15:13, September 13, 2023 (UTC)

The show was well-received. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 15:36, September 13, 2023 (UTC)

Unless you actually meant Sam & Cat, then yeah that might be added. Robin (talk) 18:35, September 3, 2023 (UTC)

Both shows are kinda garbage either way. LioToad (talk) 17:31, September 13, 2023 (UTC)

I dont know about Peg + Cat but Sam & Cat sure is mediocre at best, and i just watched that show as a kid. Robin (talk) 18:35, September 3, 2023 (UTC)

The recent Red Dead Redemption 1 ports

I am sure everyone is aware of the lazy ports of RDR1 that is the PS4 and Nintendo Switch ports, this is something i have said in that games discussion so i am asking again, should these ports get their own wikis, there is so much to talk about, for starters: Just like Far Cry 3: Classic Edition, the ports are simply the same games with little to no improvements (outside of increasing the resolution) and the biggest icing on the cake is, drum roll please, THE GAME COSTS ABOUT $49.99 which is unacceptable by today's standards, anyone i am waiting for response.

Please add rbuk

Can we add Rainbow Butterfly Unicorn Kitty. LioToad (talk) 19:55, September 13, 2023 (UTC)

Extremely overlooked "console": Emprator

How do I create a page? I found this video and wanted to create a page.

Link: https://youtu.be/u0ZqY1h6kZU?si=ZWEfBuNWaUWsqpAA

Lets wait until Poolman comes out

When Poolman comes out and the critics are actually correct about the 20% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, it'll definitely belong on bad media. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 23:26, September 23, 2023 (UTC)

Question.

Why are shows that received good reviews not allowed at all on the “bad” side? LioToad (talk) 22:17, September 25, 2023 (UTC) This wiki focuses on reception that the (insert type of media here) got not opinions--ChessGuy66 (talk) 00:51, September 26, 2023 (UTC)

Is South park Seasons 1-19, 21-present ready?

Does anyone have the sandbox because it has been a long time it did not appear?

I think Fandom has gone down to a new low here.

https://twitter.com/ZeldaWiki/status/1692950363299541256 JustNothing (talk) 20:28, September 27, 2023 (UTC)

An “It’s Made for Kids!” Defender is Lurking Around This Wikia

I don’t know if you guys have noticed but this user is spamming the comments sections of pages around the wikia, mainly, the bad episode pages of Teen Titans Go! with complaints that we are taking “the show too seriously”. Have any of you noticed this? Well, I can say this, if they’re having those complaints then why are they here? We’re here to look at entertainment beyond just something to sit there and escape. These pieces of media, live action or animated are art and kids don’t deserve repulsive content. They seem to forget that there are many pieces of media are targeted towards kids that adults love too and we care about that. Just bringing your attention to this. Have an awesome day! (talk) 18:41, September 28, 2023 (UTC)

Mhm, that user named Petergriffin something i pressume, whatever we are not taking everything serious, we just try to protect people from wasting time and money on bad stuff, anyway should i block him? Robin (talk) 18:35, September 28, 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, that’s him. He just seems to disregard it. I don’t think we should block him yet but just talk to him because I truly believe he shouldn’t be leaving those comments here. Like, I just ask myself “Why is he here if he’s just complaining about the pages taking content ‘too seriously’? This is the wrong place for him, like if he wants to call people like this out, he should go to Kiwi Farms, they do it all the time.” If he persists, then I would say block him because again, he’s in the wrong place, that’s the whole point of this wikia.

Now can i block him? he wont stop. Robin (talk) 18:35, September 28, 2023 (UTC)

Do it.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 20:35, October 15, 2023 (UTC) Finally, man i love my job. Robin (talk) 18:35, September 28, 2023 (UTC)

For how long should it be though? Robin (talk) 20:40, October 15, 2023 (UTC) A week I guess.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 20:44, October 15, 2023 (UTC)

A week it is than. Robin (talk) 20:45, October 15, 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for blocking him, Robin. Hopefully he will stop. I wonder what you will do if he persists? --Have an awesome day! (talk) 01:20, October 16, 2023 (UTC)

I will block him permanently. Robin (talk) 06:23, October 16, 2023 (UTC)

Steve Cutts

Remember those weird animations by Steve Cutts where it shows humanity bad and shit like that, well these videos teach nothing and not to mention some of his animation while unique looking are also bad, it's the equivalent of "Just because it's depressing, it doesn't make it deep or complex", anyway i do think there should be a wiki page about these, not that he's an entirely bad animator, he's also behind that amazing LA-Z Rider couch gag from The Simpsons, but his own animations that shows nothing but depressiong should be pointed out thanks Robin (talk) 14:39, September 29, 2023 (UTC)

A better exemple of animted stuff critique about world is that song from Pearl Jams from 1998 "Do The Evolution" animated by Todd MacFarlane (who is the animator behind Spawn: The Animated series), and the 2008 animated film Wall-E. Robin (talk) 14:40, September 29, 2023 (UTC)

Steve Cutts worst animated video by far has to be that infamous "Are you lost in the world like me?" Video, it is so bad that it became a meme, the artstyle is present like those classic disney shorts from the 30s/40s but the animation itself is bad, it feels like it's animated in flash animation instead and it feels lazy and very unfitting. Robin (talk) 14:40, September 29, 2023 (UTC)

What happened to Original Authority?

He hasn't been active in a while and was removed on the admin list. NewMarioBobFan (talk) 01:50, October 5, 2023 (UTC)

OA is still active on Telepedia Meta; he was supervising this wiki to make sure that it didn't end up like the original wikis, but I guess he thought that his work was done. Tali64³ (talk) 12:39, October 10, 2023 (UTC)

My response to this wiki…

Hi, I’m Batboy234 and I have used to be a user on the original Qualitipedia and seeing that a new one feels like the original never went away. I’m hoping that this wiki doesn’t end up like the former one and despite a few other pages not being made yet, for example "The Fairly OddParents (seasons 1-8)", I’d say it’s still a work in progress, so whoever are the administrators of these wikis, keep doing the amazing work! 👍

Thanks. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 18:52, October 10, 2023 (UTC)

Glad to hear that, we are actually trying to improve every flaw the older wikis had such as, no drama and forgetting about the biased pages it used to have. Robin (talk) 20:55, October 10, 2023 (UTC)

I need help with a page

How do I get rid of the "Create Me" poster because I tried figuring out different way to remove it, but none of them work.

Mhm, try adding a file or something. Robin (talk) 20:41, October 15, 2023 (UTC)

Like, a png file? If your talking about this, "File:300px" then that didn’t work either.

No, i mean like this File:Insert file name here Robin (talk) 22:25, October 15, 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I added it, now how do I put it on the page?

Found out how yet? Robin (talk) 08:03, October 17, 2023 (UTC)

Let’s see, should NHL 24 be written from a positive perspective or a negative perspective?

--ChessGuy66 (talk) 14:09, October 18, 2023 (UTC)

Who here has a YouTube channel?

Just asking.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 20:26, October 22, 2023 (UTC)

Well, I used to have one when I was a kid… but we don’t talk about that…

I'm quite popular on YouTube, about 2k subs --Blackstar0444 (talk) 04:23, October 28, 2023 (UTC)

Does the new FNAF movie belong in bad or good media?

Let's discuss --Blackstar0444 (talk) 04:21, October 28, 2023 (UTC)

Well, despite a few questionable things I had with it, I’d say that it’s a damn good time.

Anyone else got something to say? --Blackstar0444 (talk) 18:41, October 30, 2023 (UTC)

Good media. Robin (talk) 19:38, October 30, 2023 (UTC)

Happy Halloween everyone

Happy halloween --Blackstar0444 (talk) 21:46, October 31, 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Robin (talk) 22:00, October 31, 2023 (UTC)

Holy shit

I've never seen such a mess as what's going on here, spambots, edit wars... that doesn't sound good! Szczypak 64 16:06, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

Exactly, this needs to stop now. Robin User talk 16:06, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

Look! Another space invader! Szczypak 64 16:16, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

Do i really have to do this all by myself, why aren't the other admins waking up, also thanks for helping with the edit war, trust me i saw the last two seasons of PPG (1998) and it wasn't really bad as most people say it is, if it happens again i will have no choice but to block. Robin User talk 16:06, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

Thank CJ because he blacklisted me because I don't like the old wiki community, I would have helped you Robin if CJ hadn't done it! Szczypak 64 16:16, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

Well i also don't like the older wiki community, it was flawed, especially the terrible tv shows & episodes wiki. Robin User talk 16:06, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

That's right, after all, it was them who caused the closure with their stupid and thoughtless decisions made by the admins, such as quality control, strange RfC, etc., and finally it ended with this RfC closing the wiki, well, I won't forgive them for this brutality. Szczypak 64 16:16, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

Well yes, but there were also lots of biased pages such as: seasons 5 & 6 of PPG 1998, seasons 3 & 4 of Dexter's Laboratory, season 4 of Johnny Bravo, seasons 6 & 7 of The Grim adventures of Billy and mandy, seasons 5 & 6 of Ed Edd n' Eddy and more, there were also a few biased game pages of crappy games wiki such as True Crime: New York City, Dead to Rights, Dead Space (PC), etc. Robin User talk 16:06, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

The fandom version of great tv shows appears to do the same mistake, but i edit it to the better new qualitipedia versions, although sadly i can't move them because i can't delete redirects. Robin User talk 16:06, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

These biased pages were just a fault of this community because the admins couldn't decide what should go where, but it wasn't the hardest sin of this community, especially since when you opposed a popular RfC, they could literally spit on you, I experienced it or I remember these edit wars caused by in that they took popular opinions literally as facts. Szczypak 64 17:03, November 02 2023 (GMT+2)

Well this is gonna be different this time because i won't allow all of these old biased pages here, and despite being on fandom version i will try editing it to the new qualitipedia version. Robin User talk 16:06, November 02 2023 (GMT+2) Looks like the spammers and their burner accounts are stopping.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 17:02, November 2, 2023 (UTC)

Hello all, I have implemented a mixture of different measures to stop the spamming, namely AbuseFilters and the SpamBlacklist extension. Hopefully this stops the spammers, but more precautious measures could be temporarily requiring email confirmation to edit ($wgEmailConfirmToEdit in ManageWiki). This would stop a lot of spammers as the emails they are using do not exist. Notwithstanding this, in future, it would be quicker if these issues are reported in Discord so that I am notified immediately. -- Original Authority (talk) 17:07, November 2, 2023 (UTC)

Crap, I jinxed myself.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 17:28, November 2, 2023 (UTC)

Oh, dear. Looks like what I said about New Qualitipedia falling apart is all true.

Not anymore, i banned all the spambots. Robin (talk) 21:48, November 7, 2023 (UTC)

The 14th rule is questionable and unfair

Why I can't copy and paste the pages from the completely closed wikis? Because the pages from the closed wikis are interesting, and the New Qualitypedia still has few pages, already on the Greatest Movies Wiki, has more than a thousand pages, and many are copy and paste, but in New Qualitypedia it is completely prohibited, even copying and pasting pages from closed wikis, and doing "yourself" is a punishment, do you want people to be uninformed, do you want to force people to rewrite deleted wiki pages? So rule 14 should be deleted.

Well, finally someone else who sees the flaws in this rule! Szczypak 64 14:28, October 31 2023 (GMT+2)

Yes, I tried to copy and paste JW Dominion and Goat Simulator, since both were abandoned, and he deleted both and said "do it yourself" which is discrimination, and the worst of all is that Cheez deleted my page (Pikmin 4) that I initially created on Fandom version of Awesome Games. Roger (talk) 13:36, October 31, 2023 (UTC)

I don't like this rule either, kinda annoying. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 21:50, October 31, 2023 (UTC)

Agreed. Robin (talk) 22:07, October 31, 2023 (UTC)

Although at the same time, this is a reboot/remake/revival of the previous failed wikis that aims to improve alot of what these wikis failed to do, there are some pages that actually don't need changed as they were good. So yeah i also hate this rule. Robin (talk) 22:13, October 31, 2023 (UTC)

Anyway, Roger (or whatever your real name is) as long as that page is originally yours, feel free to copy and paste it without any more deletion, i will try undeleting it if it happens again. Robin (talk) 22:16, October 31, 2023 (UTC)

Well, as I said, rule 14 is very strange, meaningless and unfair, there are more existing and interesting pages on closed wikis that work in the "time machine" Roger (talk) 01:46, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

In fact, there are some pages, like Nintendo Gamecube, that actually copied and pasted, which is very beneficial, but this page is unnecessary to be placed in the New Qualitypedia because it exists on the Awesome Games Wiki on Fandom. Roger (talk) 01:49, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

I forgot to tell you about my name: Yes, my name really is Roger Roger (talk) 01:58, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

So CJ was left alone with his ridiculous rule 14, I'm against it, Blackstar's against it, even Robin doesn't like it, ChessGuy and Brazer don't really agree with what the current King is doing either, and MarioBobFan himself wasn't happy about it either, CheeseGuy is banned from a week because of this rule, damn, even RandomDX himself said on discord that he prefers Robin as the leader, well, dear brothers, everything is within our reach, we just have to strive for it. Szczypak 64 14:28, October 31 2023 (GMT+2)

There's a Discord server? --Blackstar0444 (talk) 19:19, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

I tried to click on it and it says "invite invalid" --Blackstar0444 (talk) 19:20, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

Same Robin (talk) 19:27, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

"Even RandomDX himself said on Discord that he prefers Robin as the leader", mhm in that case there might as well be a vote about this, or rfc as it's called here. Robin (talk) 19:27, November 1, 2023 (UTC) So do the RFC.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 19:42, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

I have contact with him on Discord, there is no server, and our conversations are not in English, so we probably won't understand him anyway. Szczypak 64 20:57, October 31 2023 (GMT+2)

I dont know how an RFC works, also i am afraid that i might be demoted from being an admin if i do this. Robin (talk) 19:27, November 1, 2023 (UTC) A rfc is a request for comments where you vote if something should happen or not.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 20:00, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

You can first create an RfC for promotion to bureaucrat, this is a less aggressive method of progression, if you win, and there is a high probability of this, then CJ, bored with the job, can give you the leadership title if you ask for it and then... I don't have to say anything more. Szczypak 64 20:57, October 31 2023 (GMT+2)

Alright but how do i create an RfC. Robin (talk) 19:27, November 1, 2023 (UTC) Request for comments/Promote Robin1020th as bureaucrat.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 20:10, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

Nice, now what's the template for it. Robin (talk) 19:27, November 1, 2023 (UTC) There isn’t really a template for it.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 20:18, November 1, 2023 (UTC)

Well... Uhh... Cheezburger deserved to be banned by not only putting that rule in place, but also deleting the entire Jurassic World: Dominion page just because I copied and pasted it, even though it's closed, I put it because there is no Jurassic Park/World film in this New Qualitypedia, this movie was the worst in the franchise and it's already good enough Roger (talk) 02:50, November 2, 2023 (UTC)

• ChessGuy (I barely thought of that guy's name) Roger (talk) 02:51, November 2, 2023 (UTC)

Well i am now Bureaucrat , but before you all get excited, that doesn't mean i can lift the rule, i will be demoted again if i try, sorry guys. Robin (talk) 14:28, November 5, 2023 (UTC)

And CJ is rude, I can't even copy and paste pages from closed/extints wikis anymore Roger (talk) 13:25, November 10, 2023 (UTC)

I understand your pain but i sadly can't do anything about it. Robin (talk) 14:28, November 5, 2023 (UTC)

Go to my user page and try to find "The New Crappy Games Wiki". Szczypak 64 17:03, November 10 2023 (GMT+2)

Since you, Robin, will be demoted if you delete rule 14, so we must force CJ to delete rule 14 Roger (talk) 23:50, November 10, 2023 (UTC)

I don't like this rule either. It's very stupid. It's not fair to the people who originally created the pages either, and remaking all of them just in different words would be pointless and a huge waste of time. Please remove it.--CheeseGuy17 (talk) 22:39, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

See the current rules. --Raidarr (talk) 01:44, November 24, 2023 (UTC)

Rule 14 has not yet been deleted

Most closed wiki pages are good enough to not keep editing, I released two pages (Goat Simulator and Jurassic World: Dominion) just to expand the New Qualitypedia, but CJ keeps deleting and saying "do it yourself", which is a pain to create the pages with loads of information, so rule 14 should be changed like this:

"If you copy and paste pages from closed wikis, you must write "Note: This page was copied and pasted from the "name of wiki" Wiki, if not write like this, you will be warned."

So, rule 14 should be deleted, as this wastes more time writing the page with a lot of information already existing in closed wikis. Roger (talk) 13:24, November 10, 2023 (UTC)

Agreed. Robin (talk) 13:24, November 10, 2023 (UTC)

No, this is a non-negotiable rule, and it will not change. Point blank. This is something you can't argue with. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 15:59, November 10, 2023 (UTC)

And the problem is that this Wiki is getting empty and no one, so rule 14 should be deleted Roger (talk) 21:46, November 10, 2023 (UTC)

• gulp* oh dear. Now it’s the beginning of the downfall for New Qualitipedia… for real.

How can this be the downfall of New Qualitipedia if it never changed to begin with? CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 07:24, November 11, 2023 (UTC)

Errmmm... I don't know who you are, you unknown user who has no name, but New Qualitypedia is still active, but the problem is rule 14, which removes people's freedom to copy and paste the pages of extinct wikis... Roger (talk) 23:44, November 10, 2023 (UTC)

Your two arguments are very poor in reality. Copy pasting pages because the wiki is getting empty is wrong because you can simply make pages on your own. Not only does your reasoning make you look like a lazy person who doesn't want to work hard, but it also violates content fork on Telepedia's Content Policy, which strictly forbid that. Original Authority once gave me an exception in copy pasting pages, and I ran with it until some people told me that copy pasting pages is not going to improve the wiki. So I forbid that. And no, Rule 14 doesn't remove people's freedom. People like RandomDX57 (or ThePCGamer) still write their pages with their own words barely copy pasting anything from the original Reception Wikis. I hope you understand this CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 07:24, November 11, 2023 (UTC)

"it also violates content fork on Telepedia's Content Policy, which strictly forbid that"

So, you bureaucrat, then why didn't you delete some pages that were copied and pasted? They are "violating Telepedia rules", So why are quality pages on Fandom (like Awesome Games Wiki: Roger (talk) 00:51, November 12, 2023 (UTC)

Complementing: https://awesome-games.fandom.com/wiki/Awesome_Games_Wiki and Crappy Games Wiki: https://cvgw.fandom.com/wiki/Crappy_Games_Wiki) copy and paste the pages that were in New Qualitypedia? you are not even protective Roger (talk) 00:56, November 12, 2023 (UTC)

Some pages were left there because I didn't want to waste people's work in copy pasted it, and stated that pages copy pasted before the rule was implemented were allowed to stag CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 07:42, November 12, 2023 (UTC)

Oh... Ok... Roger (talk) 12:27, November 12, 2023 (UTC)

And why did you implement rule 14 if before this unfair rule there were pages copied and pasted? Where is Telepedia's policy? Roger (talk) 16:13, November 15, 2023 (UTC)

Excuse me, good sir but I believe you made an Oopsie.

Mr. CHWorldGame32125, I believe you thought the page I made of the 2012 film adaptation of "The Lorax" was copy and pasted, which in fact was not, I mean, I copied it, yes, but I didn’t do the pate part, I just loaded up the way back machine and copied it from there (again NOT paste), so just wanted to let’s you know. Batboy234 9:47 November 10, 2023.

Put Garena Free Fire, one of the most played games in the world, here?

In fact, the Crappy Games Wiki page existed before the Wiki was extinguished, If so, I'll copy and paste, but modifying it so it doesn't look the same. Roger (talk) 12:31, November 12, 2023 (UTC)

You can do that. Make sure it'll be different enough to not be almost identical CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 13:41, November 12, 2023 (UTC)

Making The Ghost!

Just making a new page called The Ghost!

That's kind of unnecessary if it's already on Wretched YouTubers Wiki already. Robin (talk) 19:00, November 12, 2023 (UTC)

I Want Add Noel But There’s a Problem

Have you guys heard of the obscure Christmas movie, Noel? Well, it’s about a sentient Christmas ornament and it takes a dark turn, eventually, the ornament becomes abandoned, years later, he breaks and becomes a spirit. However, I would add the movie but it has mixed reviews, some people like it, others don’t, problem because it’s too dark. What are your thoughts?--Have an awesome day! (talk) 20:42, November 14, 2023 (UTC)

No idea, i haven't even seen the movie yet. Just put it as good qualities and bad qualities. That's what i do when addig mixed received media. Robin (talk) 20:45, November 14, 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, that's a great idea!--Have an awesome day! (talk) 19:26, November 16, 2023 (UTC)

I started the page in a sandbox because I can't decide whether to write this movie as a bad movie article or a good movie article. As I said, the movie got mixed reception. I haven't seen the movie but listened to two reviews on YouTube and I can conclude I don't like it. But I fear if I write as a bad movie page, I may cause a war. (Some people actually like it)--Have an awesome day! (talk) 03:59, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

Write it as a balance. You have my authorization as an admin and bureaucrat to present both sides equally. --Raidarr (talk) 15:24, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, officially wrote the page, made it a negative page but added enough points to where it is equal.--Have an awesome day! (talk) 02:16, November 25, 2023 (UTC)

Why was sonic colors deleted?

It wasn’t biased or poorly written, But CJ deleted it and didn’t give reasoning. I’m not happy with this.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 14:03, November 15, 2023 (UTC)

And either Robin or I should be an admin of this wiki, CJ has already implemented unfair rule 14, and the Peppa Pig page is entirely copied and pasted from the now defunct Terrible TV Shows Wiki, and deleted my existing page "Pikmin 4" (now it's still on New Qualitypedia) Roger (talk) 16:10, November 15, 2023 (UTC)

I'll repeat again, if you hate these rules that're on this wiki, go to my wiki. @Roger: I've promoted you as a member on my wiki so you can go there. Szczypak 64 17:14, November 15 2023 (GMT+2)

But there are no pages @Szczpak 64 Roger (talk) 00:10, November 17, 2023 (UTC)

How there's no pages on my wiki, @Roger:? There's no rule 14th so you can fel free with copy-pasting there and the pages will be! (: Szczypak 64 57:54, November 17 2023 (GMT+2)

Rule 14 is irritating and idiot

Why did you put the rule in the middle of nowhere? And the "voiding the reboot proposal" thing is terrible ugliness, If you think it would "override", then explain:

https://awesome-games.fandom.com/wiki/Awesome_Games_Wiki https://cvgw.fandom.com/wiki/Crappy_Games_Wiki https://greatestmovies.fandom.com/wiki/GreatestMovies_Wiki https://best-tv-shows.fandom.com/wiki/Best_TV_Shows_Wiki

And these four links have pages copied and pasted from extinct wikis and even from the New Qualitypedia. Roger (talk) 00:07, November 17, 2023 (UTC)

I love how you act like I also contribute there, and therefore mean I do everything there. No, that's not how it works chief, I don't contribute there, a lot of pages come from their original counterparts on Miraheze, I had no clue certain pages were copy pasted from New Qualitipedia. I'll resolve this. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 05:06, November 17, 2023 (UTC)

My god… what has this Qualitipedia community come to?

But if the situation gets worse… it could only led to one thing: Qualitipedia will collapse literally, and the people will give up on it for real. I know CJ will not let that happen, will he?

It's still stupid and sad that many wikis about qualities were defunct, there wasn't even a backup, and rule 14 should add, like "you must credit the people who made/edited the pages", and not prohibiting copying and pasting even with the note saying that the page was copied and pasted from extinct wikis, I still don't know if it's possible to see which people made/edited the pages of the extinct wikis, but deleting the wiki with detailed, important pages that took a long time to make is absurd. Roger (talk) 00:08, November 18, 2023 (UTC)

It's good to have a backup of the pages of extinct wikis/credit the users who made/edited Roger (talk) 00:11, November 18, 2023 (UTC)

Remove Brazilian User from Administrator

Granting Brazilian User access to be an administrator is one of various unwise decisions I've seen recently and is the first that needs to be undone. In his very short term there are already several examples why.

• He is power hungry and has no understanding of the responsibility involved. User page: "I'm an administrator! Remember that you must follow the wiki rules, otherwise I will block you! MWAHAHAHA!" Immature and unfunny. "Hello, this is the Brazilian User user page. Don't insult him, especially since he's an administrator now." Especially? An insult is an insult, have a thicker skin and deal with it normally. The role does not entitle you to be bulletproof against criticism but more on that shortly. I get having a little pride but this is concerning.
• Removing a perfectly relevant post because it offended his sensibilities. To draw from that post and surrounding thread,
• Unsatisfied and ungrateful, thinking that he must have bureaucrat to be an admin. Considering admins can do almost anything and bureaucrat has the power to totally alter the configuration or straight up delete the wiki if he plays with the wrong buttons, this is concerning. It also shows a total lack of understanding what admins are. He thinks he deserves it without even trying to justify why.
• The promotion was not warranted in the first place. Following rules is basic behavior. Improving pages is normal behavior. Poor judgement moments after being promoted does not lend confidence to him deciding what inappropriate behavior is.

There is a reason Brazilian User was never on the table for promotion in QP. These decisions have - should have - weight. An admin is a leader, a representative. A bureaucrat even more so, as that role carries the highest judgement short of the owner of Telepedia. This little show already has the wiki at the knife's edge. Don't take my word for it: "I think everyone needs to just get along and stop being so—frankly—immature, this behaviour is reminiscent of the original Qualitipedia and if it continues I will just close the wiki."

If you do not stop and think immediately, the wiki's existence is on the line and I challenge any of you to find a host that will make the mistake of approving such a wiki. Consider your next steps carefully. CJ is advised to take advice that has already been posted on telepedia meta and through discord and start correcting the ship before it slips under the waves. Robin is advised to step up and think through these decisions. Both need to start working together. A bureaucrat worrying about being demoted for rogue actions means something is fatally wrong on both sides. --Raidarr (talk) 22:30, November 18, 2023 (UTC)

Hmm… "I think everyone needs to just get along and stop being so—frankly—immature, this behaviour is reminiscent of the original Qualitipedia and if it continues I will just close the wiki." what does that line of the discussion mean?

Hello, everyone

It's me, SuperStreetKombat, one of the ex-admins of the old Qualitipedia. So lately, I've been noticing a lot of issues going on here on New Qualitipedia such as complaints regarding Rule 14, admins like Robin getting demoted, and other admins like Brazillian User abusing their power, so I thought I'd step in and see if I can help anyone with whatever issues that go on around here.

Normally, I was planning on not coming to this wiki and I was about to let it carry on as is, but with other users like mature templates being misused, custom headings like "Autobot Qualities" or "Decepticon Qualities" being added to a few Transformers pages, etc., I just couldn't let these issues go on, as the old QP also suffered from them, so I'm hoping that I could sort at least a few of them out.

As some of you can already tell, I'm currently an admin on a few wikis on Miraheze like Amazing YouTubers Wiki (promoted by Tali due to the ongoing vandalism there), both of the Characters Wikis, as well as the recreation of Weirdcyclopedia, since that wiki got deleted from ShoutWiki due to the issues that plagued it for months, so hopefully I'm trustworthy enough to be an admin or at least a mod to keep this wiki on track again and stop it from shutting down. Thanks. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 11:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

I can promote you if you want CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 20:21, November 19, 2023 (UTC)

Sure why not? I think that can work. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Actually, about Rule 14 (now 13), I started it, the rule about copying and pasting pages is still an abused rule, Miraheze pages now look like they are starting to "corrupt" for some reason, and there were many detailed pages on the old wikis, I simply copied and pasted Goat Simulator (I have now recreated the page, but with my words), Jurassic World: Dominion and Jurassic Park (the page got brutally buggy), these three pages were deleted by CJ and said to me "do it yourself", while Jurassic Park was fair to be deleted, the other two made no sense, even though I wrote it was copied and pasted from closed wikis (and I would love to have credited the users who made/edited the pages, but I can't see it) Roger (talk) 02:02, November 20, 2023 (UTC)

Help, I can't create an account

Hello, I am Earldridge Jazzed Pineda. When I try to create an account on New Qualitipedia, it says that it is limited to autoconfirmed users, administrators, and users. This problem has nothing to do with Telepedia because I can create accounts on other wikis. Because non-users can't create accounts, I have to make all edits under my IP address. Why did the administrators disable non-users the ability to create accounts in the first place?

If you can't create an account, it is not just you. That problem applies to all users, whether logged in or not, of New Qualitipedia. You can express your concerns too by replying below. 110.54.167.215 08:02, November 20, 2023 (UTC)

This may have been an anti-spam measure, which doesn't make much sense given IPs can still edit but oh well. CJ is the only bureaucrat with the right permissions so he would have to look, or OA if he decides to step in. For now you can register an account at Telepedia Meta. Because this is a wiki network the account will work here. --Raidarr (talk) 09:47, November 20, 2023 (UTC)

Rule 14 (now 13) is causing problems and should be eliminated/modified to a new rule

Raidarr, including me (Roger), Brazilian User and many Discord users, wants Rule 14 eliminated or the rule is changed, how to allow copying and pasting pages from extinct wikis, and not existing wikis (it will be automatically deleted because it doesn't make sense to have two or more wikis with the same pages and same texts, unless you copy pages from existing wikis that are not part of Telepedia, Miraheze and/or Media Wiki), but Radarr's idea of ​​putting the link from where he copied it, I had never thought of that, but this could prove that he really copied and pasted it, and CJ for no reason deleted my page that I migrated here, Pikmin 4. Roger (talk) 11:11, November 20, 2023 (UTC)

The rule has been changed. CJ is no longer actively opposing. Please review Qualitipedia:Rules because we are not allowing imports of anything without extra work: pages that are brought in need to be tidied up and sourced, preferably imported. --Raidarr (talk) 16:11, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

That's it. I'm leaving this wiki.

1. Unfair and meaningless rules, notably rule 13.
2. They take everything seriously, including jokes and that is the reason why I am no longer an administrator on this wiki
3. Useless and hateful pages
4. Overall, I found the idea of ​​a Qualitipedia reboot very interesting, but the Qualitipedia reboot is the original Qualitipedia in disguise. So, bye friends (and foes). - Brazilian User

Please don’t go!ChessGuy66 (talk) 18:53, November 21, 2023 (UTC)

Honestly, I've lost a interest considering how poor is the administration and I don't know how long will I survive on this wiki. If Robin retires, me too. Szczypak 64 20:11, November 21 2023 (GMT+2)

Who wrote this topic? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

It was written by Brazilian User. --Raidarr (talk) 22:10, November 21, 2023 (UTC)

Yes. It was me - Brazilian User Brazilian User (talk) 21:17, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

Wait! Dont leave yet,i will try my best to improve all of the flaws this wiki has, just tell me what's wrong and i will fix it. Robin Talk11:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Robin, we need to end rule 13 (formerly 14) immediately! It is a very stupid rule, considering that it is very unfair to whoever created the page, as well as there were pages that almost everyone could agree on, such as the original Tetris (which is not on this wiki) and Balan Wonderland (ditto) and Plants vs. Zombies: Battle for Neighborville. As if that wasn't enough, it caused a mess because we kept copying pages from QP for a while, and a user got banned (yes, banned. Banned. Banned!) just because of that. He has never offended anyone, let alone a page on this wiki. We need to try to end this rule! And obviously, the other things I mentioned, users need to learn what a joke is, and not take everything seriously like they did with me. - Brazilian User @Brazilian User: just go to my wiki because this is the best way for you. -Szczypak64 Unfortunately, I can't log in to the wiki. Brazilian User (talk) 22:35, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

When I was an administrator, they said I was "abusing my power." Maybe they think that blocking Raidarr because he had a ridiculous and immature tantrum about how "irresponsible" I would be as a bureaucrat (note that no one was criticizing my edits, Robin even thanked me for mine) was abusing the power of an admin. "He is power hungry and doesn't understand the responsibility involved." I'm hungry because I want to devour rule 13. The page "Don't break the wiki rules or I'll block you! MWAHAHAHAHA!" username was clearly meant to be a joke, which is obvious to even the most naive user. The talk page had a warning similar to CJ's, except Raidarr couldn't handle my warning, and CJ's could. Honestly, this wiki is not cool (I consider whoever says that phrase to be a poet). Brazilian User (talk) 22:53, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

I am not going to bother trying to explain your problems because you've ignored or twisted the case why you were unfit for the role. This was never criticism of you as an editor, simply a statement that you were not appropriate as a member of staff. I have taken this approach consistently with others and you don't have to like me for it. Your options are to move on or to leave. What you will not do is declare you will leave while coming up with excuses to complain some more and vandalizing my talk page. I wasn't going to mention it out of decency but I went to Original Authority and asked him lift your block because my issue was not with you personally or your wider editing. If you insist on creating drama then I will have no choice but to put that block back so you can cool off and move on. Don't force me to take that step because it really shouldn't be necessary. --Raidarr (talk) 23:28, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

@Raidarr "You are not appropriate as a member of staff" Why? I don't understand why you suddenly came to that conclusion. Brazilian User (talk) 16:13, November 24, 2023 (UTC)

@Brazilian User: maybe you've entered accidentialy wrong password? Check out the passwords if you can but even if you entered correct password, remember you can alway create new account and see my wiki. Szczypak64 (talk) 14:05, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

REMOVE/CHANGE RULE 13!!! New Qualitipedia is getting worse!

New Qualitypedia is getting worse because of damn rule 13, this made the administrators leave this wiki due to bad moderation, I am an admin and creator of Pikmin WIP Wiki on Fandom (I will change the name as soon as the Roblox Pikmin fan game changes the name), and the rules are very basic, poorly made and unfinished, and even so, my wiki is not as bad as this wiki, and there wasn't even any drama. Roger (talk) 23:24, November 21, 2023 (UTC)

No offense but you do realize that spamming the same complaints over and over gets annoying and tiresome after a while, right? Plus, this won't make the rule magically change or go away any faster. The admins are still discussing over this, so please have some patience.

And about the rule it self, as much as I find this rule to be controversial, I'm very neutral over this (meaning that I'm not with or against this policy). Snow (talk) 02:00, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

Well... I didn't know that the admins are discussing... Thanks for warning Roger (talk) 10:37, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I have brought it to CJ's attention in two places in fact. This is on top of many long-needed changes to make this wiki usable. There must be patience. --Raidarr (talk) 14:19, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

Rule has been changed, for the record. --Raidarr (talk) 22:11, November 25, 2023 (UTC)

Interesting update! (SocialProfile)

What do you guys think? Blackstar0444 (talk) 07:04, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

About what? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 08:40, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

You'll need to be specific, there have been several and there will be more. --Raidarr (talk) 14:20, November 22, 2023 (UTC)

I mean this --Blackstar0444 (talk) 00:43, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

Ah yes, that is the SocialProfile extension. It was used a lot on old Qualitipedia. The error you mention below is a lingering problem that @Original Authority: is working on. The layout looks weird because I haven't put in a few hacks that make it look better yet. It will look more familiar if you hit the "Use wiki Userpage" button. --Raidarr (talk) 03:14, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

How do i fix this issue? I put a picture of Anne Boonchuy from Amphibia on my profile picture, but Anne doesn’t seem to appear.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 03:21, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

The issue cannot be fixed yet, sadly. Let's just wait and see what happens. Blackstar0444 (talk) 03:36, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

I tried to put a pfp but I can't see it. --Blackstar0444 (talk) 00:48, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

Same.--ChessGuy66 (talk) 00:49, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

The same as me, when I place a drawing I made, it appears as "?" or a generic photo icon Roger (talk) 12:28, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

When I download, the notification just says "Download failed", as if the wiki is corrupting Roger (talk) 12:32, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

This is a known issue. Very similar topics have been merged. Original Authority is working on a fix. --Raidarr (talk) 13:22, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

Hello all! This was a known issue, that I thought I had solved a few days ago, but obviously not. Rest assured, it is now fixed. You will need to remove your avatar and reupload it for things to show properly. Furthermore, the images will be cached and as a result, may not immediately show if you change it frequently. I will work on implementing a way for the cache to be evicted when an avatar is changed, but this is pretty low on my priority list.

I just wanted to reiterate the point that I've mentioned numerous times before. This talk page is not monitored and as such, there is no value in raising Platform-wide (or even any technical issue) here, because it simply won't be caught. I thought I fixed this issue days ago and if Raidarr hadn't tagged me in this, I would never have known that the fix I implemented didn't take. Please consider raising technical issues on Phorge (although the future of Phorge is up in the air), or Discord in the #support channel, as these are monitored. -- Original Authority (talk) 14:20, November 23, 2023 (UTC)

Also note that the Staff noticeboard exists to bring issues to staff attention and should be used to report problems, not this page. If it's an issue that can't be handled locally it can be forwarded by staff to Phorge or the official support channel on discord. --Raidarr (talk) 16:09, November 23, 2023 (UTC)